Hi, Jiaju
2013/2/19 Jiaju Zhang :
> On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 18:26 +0900, yusuke iida wrote:
>> Hi, Jiaju
>>
>> Thank you for merging!
>>
>> BTW, is there any comment about the patent that I heard before?
>
> I don't think there are any patent related problems here. There are
> quite a lot of open so
Hi Takatoshi,
Thank you for your explanation !
Regards,
Cristiane
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> Hi Cristiane
>
> 2013/2/27 Cristiane França :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I need to configure PostgreSQL on Pacemaker and I have a question:
> > what is the difference between con
Hi Cristiane
2013/2/27 Cristiane França :
> Hello,
>
> I need to configure PostgreSQL on Pacemaker and I have a question:
> what is the difference between configures PostgreSQL as
> OCF::heartbeat:pgsql or lsb:pgsql?
OCF::heartbeat:pgsql can
- monitor PostgreSQL using SQL.
- use sophisticated err
I have just find out the problem.
Actually was a problem with the logic on how nginx check the status of the
PID.
I just fixed the init script and now it is returning no error.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Charles Mean wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I think I get it.
> After I cleaned the resource(HA
On 2013-02-25T10:21:00, David Teigland wrote:
> 1. linux/fs/dlm, used by gfs2 (and infrequently by ocfs2)
> 2. linux/fs/ocfs2/dlm, used by ocfs2
>
> I don't know which the article refers to or what's meant by "unclear".
> I maintain 1 and would not call it unclear. You should use 2 with ocfs2;
Hey guys,
I think I get it.
After I cleaned the resource(HA_NGINX) and now it just reports an error on
monitoring the passive host.
Failed actions:
NGINX_HA_monitor_0 (node=host04, call=55, rc=1, status=complete):
unknown error
Once the resource is running on host03, I guess it is normal, is
Hello,
I need to configure PostgreSQL on Pacemaker and I have a question:
what is the difference between configures PostgreSQL as
OCF::heartbeat:pgsql or lsb:pgsql?
What is the best set of PostgreSQL? using LSB or OCF?
Regards,
Cristiane.
___
Pacemaker
Hi,
it might be historical logs, which appeared during your configuration
process (in case of commit not completed config) . Have you tried to clean
up resource (I mean "crm resource cleanup NGINX_HA") ?
Try then stop|start|migrate resource, are Filed action still present ?
BTW: Try look into /v
- Original Message -
> From: "Charles Mean"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:42:29 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] unknown error
>
>
>
> Hey there,
>
> I am running heartbeat with pacemaker and it is working quite well.
> However, there is an error b
Hey there,
I am running heartbeat with pacemaker and it is working quite well.
However, there is an error bugging me off, when I use crm_mon to see the
cluster status, it show me and section caled "Failed actions".
Failed actions:
NGINX_HA_monitor_0 (node=host04, call=3, rc=1, status=complete
- Original Message -
> From: "Ron Kerry"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 7:41:35 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] pcs not able to display or set resource meta attributes
> ?
>
> I have much more familiarity with the crmsh so I apologize if I am
> just no
On 2013-02-25T11:42:46, "Lentes, Bernd"
wrote:
Hi Bernd,
> in the german IT newspaper "Linux-Magazin" 2/13 was an article, which says
> that the future of DLM (Distributed Lock Manager) is unclear.
> I'd like to create a HA cluster with two nodes, accessing concurrently one FC
> SAN with OCFS
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:31:52AM +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:39:52AM +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Donald Stahl wrote:
> >> >> No.
> >> >>
> >> >> [quote]
> >> >>
26.02.2013 11:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
> wrote:
>> Hi Andrew, all,
>>
>> I had an idea last night, that it may be worth implementing
>> fully-dynamic cluster resize support in pacemaker,
>
> We already support nodes being added on the fly. A
Great news!
Regards,
Honza
Charles Williams napsal(a):
> Hey all,
>
> I recently got a chance to finally build Debian packages for the
> 0.5.2 version of ClusterLabs Hawk GUI. These are Squeeze packages
> ATM (Wheezy to come next week dependent upon testing of the
> current packages) and I am
I was in the process of replying...
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> Sorry for being annoying, but... bump.
>
> 18.02.2013 10:18, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>> Hi Andrew, all,
>>
>> I had an idea last night, that it may be worth implementing
>> fully-dynamic cluster res
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> Hi Andrew, all,
>
> I had an idea last night, that it may be worth implementing
> fully-dynamic cluster resize support in pacemaker,
We already support nodes being added on the fly. As soon as they show
up in the membership we add them
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Thierry DECKER wrote:
> Preparing a cluster for running an active/active firewall.
>
> Runing both nodes on Debian Sqeeze, corosync 1.2.1.
>
> Each box has 3 nics :
>
> - eth0 used as inside interface
> - eth1 used as corosync communication between the nodes
> - et
Sorry for being annoying, but... bump.
18.02.2013 10:18, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> Hi Andrew, all,
>
> I had an idea last night, that it may be worth implementing
> fully-dynamic cluster resize support in pacemaker, utilizing
> possibilities CMAP and votequorum provide.
>
> Idea is to:
> * Do
19 matches
Mail list logo
