Re: [Pacemaker] Nodes appear UNCLEAN (offline) during Pacemaker upgrade to 1.1.7

2012-11-25 Thread Parshvi
Thanks Andrew for your input. Andrew Beekhof writes: > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Parshvi wrote: > > Hi, > > We are upgrading to Pacemaker 1.1.7 and Corosync 1.4.3. > > The previous version was: > > Pacemaker: 1.0.12 > > Corosync : 1.2.7 > > The issues faced in the older version are: >

Re: [Pacemaker] Fwd: Problem with monitor

2012-11-25 Thread Soni Maula Harriz
you should use stonith device for the server and configure stonith-enabled to true to get the expected behavior of the resource failure. On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Юлия Школьникова wrote: > Hello, again. Why you didn't answer me? I so need your help!! > > Пересылаемое сообщение -

Re: [Pacemaker] Dangling last-failure transient attribute

2012-11-25 Thread Andrew Beekhof
Could be a bug. crm_report? On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Hi, > > Looking at pengine inputs (06229e9) I noticed that there are transient > last-failure- attributes for resources last failed a long ago > (more that 6 seconds). > > Example is: >join="member" e

Re: [Pacemaker] Resources time out

2012-11-25 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Pedro Sousa wrote: > Hi, > > thank you for your answer. > > Do you think that if I increase the resource timeout that's failling it will > solve the problem? It couldn't hurt. > > Regards, > Pedro Sousa > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Andrew Beekhof wro

Re: [Pacemaker] Resources time out

2012-11-25 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hi, thank you for your answer. Do you think that if I increase the resource timeout that's failling it will solve the problem? Regards, Pedro Sousa On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Pedro Sousa wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > some strange b

Re: [Pacemaker] Creating rules to migrate another group

2012-11-25 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Carlos Luna wrote: > Hello. > > I have a task that I can't seem to figure out how to implement in PaceMaker. > > I have two virtual ip resources and they are grouped together (colocated). > They > are initially started on node 1. > > I have a group of resources (

Re: [Pacemaker] Resources time out

2012-11-25 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Pedro Sousa wrote: > Hi all, > > some strange behavior is happening when I do some more intensive work on my > cluster like running a bash script or wireshark, some pacemaker resources > start to time out and fail back to the other node. I was running this > script

Re: [Pacemaker] Nodes appear UNCLEAN (offline) during Pacemaker upgrade to 1.1.7

2012-11-25 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Parshvi wrote: > Hi, > We are upgrading to Pacemaker 1.1.7 and Corosync 1.4.3. > The previous version was: > Pacemaker: 1.0.12 > Corosync : 1.2.7 > The issues faced in the older version are: > 1) Numerous, Policy engine and crmd crashes, stopping failed cluster re

Re: [Pacemaker] colocation conundrum

2012-11-25 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Craig Donnelly wrote: > Hi there, > > I think Ive exhausted everything I can find online in terms of trying to > solve my problem so here goes with a posting to see if anyone on this mailing > list might be able to help please. > > I have a pacemaker1.1.7/corosyn