Re: [Pacemaker] chicken-egg-problem with libvirtd and a VM within cluster

2012-10-12 Thread Arnold Krille
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 09:22:13 +0200 Florian Haas wrote: > For most people, this issue doesn't occur on system boot, as libvirtd > would normally start before corosync, or corosync/pacemaker isn't part > of the system bootup sequence at all (the latter is preferred for > two-node clusters to prevent

[Pacemaker] Stuck in a STONITH cycle

2012-10-12 Thread David Parker
Hello, I have two nodes set up in a cluster to provide a MySQL server (mysqld) in HA on a virtual IP address. This was working fine until I had to reboot the servers. All I did was change the interface each node uses for its primary IP address (changed from eth1 to eth0 on each node). Now

Re: [Pacemaker] STONITHed node cannot rejoin cluster for over 1000 elections

2012-10-12 Thread Andrew Martin
Hi Andrew, Thanks, I'll compile Pacemaker 1.1.8 and Corosync 1.4.4. Can I leave cluster-glue and resource-agents at the default versions provided with Ubuntu 12.04 (1.0.8 and 3.9.2 respectively), or do I need to upgrade them as well? Andrew - Original Message - From: "Andrew Beek

Re: [Pacemaker] chicken-egg-problem with libvirtd and a VM within cluster

2012-10-12 Thread Florian Haas
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > This has been a topic that has popped up occasionally over the years. > Unfortunately we still don't have a good answer for you. > > The "least worst" practice has been to have the RA return OCF_STOPPED > for non-recurring monitor operations