Re: [Pacemaker] When are you going to release the next version of Booth?

2012-09-14 Thread Jiaju Zhang
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 19:16 +0900, Yuichi SEINO wrote: > Hi Jiaju, > > If the schedule is determined, I would like to know when you are going > to release the next version of booth. Sorry, it has not been decided yet. Currently I myself am busy with other work and have not found time yet ... >

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-14 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
14.09.2012 09:54, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 13.09.2012 15:18, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > > ... > >> and now it runs on my testing cluster. >> >> Ipc-related memory problems seem to be completely fixed now, processes >> own memory (RES-SHR in terms of htop) does not grow any longer (after 40 >>

[Pacemaker] Percona MySQL RA on MySQL 5.5 problem

2012-09-14 Thread Nathan Bird
I tried searching a bit and it seems like this one hasn't been reported yet, my apologies if it has. The RA currently issues a "RESET SLAVE" command, but the meaning of this changed in 5.5. https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/reset-slave.html It now needs to do a "RESET SLAVE ALL". Before I

[Pacemaker] correct way to deploy a CLVM configuration with pacemaker

2012-09-14 Thread Alberto Menichetti
Hi all, I'm trying to deploy a CLVM configuration; my VGs will be active on only 1 node at time and I won't use a clustered fs but ext3. I configured clvmd and dlm in this way: primitive cluster-dlm ocf:pacemaker:controld op monitor interval="60" \ timeout="60" meta is-managed="true" primi

[Pacemaker] crm shell issues

2012-09-14 Thread Borislav Borisov
Hi all, Dejan, I am struggling to get the latest crmsh version (812:b58a3398bf11) to work with the latest pacemaker version () and so far I've encountered couple of issues. The first one, which was already discussed on the list, INFO: object Cluster-Server-1 cannot be represented in the CLI nota

Re: [Pacemaker] [COLOCATION] constraints

2012-09-14 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-09-14T10:26:05, Kashif Jawed Siddiqui wrote: > Why the ordering of allocating resource cannot follow one format? Why > difference of configuration? Because it was a mistake made at one point and then it became impossible to fix because existing configurations and scripts would have

Re: [Pacemaker] [COLOCATION] constraints

2012-09-14 Thread Kashif Jawed Siddiqui
Hi, colocation myset-1 inf: app2 app1 The above indicates app1 is the Dominant resource. If app1 is stopped, app2 also stops The chain is app1 -> app2 Next, colocation myset inf: app1 app2 app3 the above indiactes app1 is the Dominant resource. If app1 is st

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemakerd does not daemonize

2012-09-14 Thread Borislav Borisov
Mysteriously the problem is gone, so I guess I screwed up the installation at some point. On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Borislav Borisov < borislav.v.bori...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, Andrew, > > > I am performing tests against pacemaker from commit > 7a9bf21cfc993530812ee43bde8c5af2653c

[Pacemaker] pacemakerd does not daemonize

2012-09-14 Thread Borislav Borisov
Hello all, Andrew, I am performing tests against pacemaker from commit 7a9bf21cfc993530812ee43bde8c5af2653c1fa6 and for some reason it does not want to daemonize: root@Cluster-Server-1:~/crmsh# pacemakerd -V Could not establish pacemakerd connection: Connection refused (111) info: crm_ipc_co

Re: [Pacemaker] master/slave resource does not stop (tries start repeatedly)

2012-09-14 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Andrew, I confirmed that this problem had been resolved. - ClusterLabs/pacemaker : 7a9bf21cfc However, I found two problems. (1) it is output with orphan in crm_mon. # crm_mon -rf1 : Full list of resources: Master/Slave Set: msAP [prmAP] Stopped: [ prmAP:0 prmAP:1 ] Mig