[Pacemaker] [Problem] About the replacement of the master/slave resource.

2012-09-09 Thread renayama19661014
Hi All, We confirmed movement of the trouble of the clone resource that we combined with Master/Slave resource. The master / slave resources are replaced under the influence of the trouble of the clonal resource. We confirmed it in the next procedure. Step1) We start a cluster and send cib.

[Pacemaker] A VirtualDomain resource is deleted immediatly after create.

2012-09-09 Thread Changlimin
Hi; I create some VirtualDomain resources VMwindows-moban-7 and VMwindows-moban-6. I cannot see VMwindows-moban-7 when do crm status. In the syslog, the VMwindows-moban-7 is deleted immediatly after create. OS: ubuntu 12.04 server LTS. Sep 7 09:39:23 server1 cib: [7823]: debug:

Re: [Pacemaker] fencing best practices for virtual environments

2012-09-09 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Alberto, I think that I should set plural external/vcenter if your problem is practice of stonith when vcenter falls and is not usable. Please refer to the next email and patch. * http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/78702 Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Sun, 2012/9/9, Al

[Pacemaker] Clustered LVM in failover cluster

2012-09-09 Thread David Morton
Not directly Pacemaker related but a simple question for those who manage clusters ... I'm recreating our failover cluster on a new SAN which will use cLVM and XFS, I am after some clarification that the "--clustered y" directive is the correct and appropriate way to create the volume groups as th

Re: [Pacemaker] CRM CLI guide gone?

2012-09-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Andreas Ntaflos wrote: > It seems the CRM CLI guide formally found under > > http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/crm_cli.html > > is gone (404). Why so? Has it moved somewhere else? Yes. The shell has its own project and is hosting its own documentation. > > I found it

Re: [Pacemaker] about iTCO_wdt watchdog

2012-09-09 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-09-09T09:44:12, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > > you misunderstand me. I just simulate a system crash to test if the > > watchdog can reboot the system . > All kernel wdt modules still rely on a functioning kernel. Actually, no, except for softdog, they do not. TCO_wdt *is* a hardware-assisted

Re: [Pacemaker] fencing best practices for virtual environments

2012-09-09 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-09-09T13:30:36, Alberto Menichetti wrote: > I've successfully configured and tested the stonith plugin > "external/vcenter"; but this plugin introduces a single point of > failure in my cluster infrastructure because it depends on the > availability of the virtual center (which is, in the

[Pacemaker] using op_defaults to change default operation failure action?

2012-09-09 Thread Nenad Opsenica
Hi everybody, Is it possible to use "op_defaults" to specify default failure action for specific operation? I'm particulary interested in specifying action if "stop" fails, it should not get node fenced but further actions blocked. I was googling for hours, and didn't manage to find any 100%

Re: [Pacemaker] about iTCO_wdt watchdog

2012-09-09 Thread Vadym Chepkov
On Aug 2, 2012, at 4:06 AM, Mia Lueng wrote: > you misunderstand me. I just simulate a system crash to test if the > watchdog can reboot the system . > All kernel wdt modules still rely on a functioning kernel. But you crashed kernel at this point, so no one will reboot your system. What I thin

[Pacemaker] fencing best practices for virtual environments

2012-09-09 Thread Alberto Menichetti
Hi all, I'm setting up a two-node pacemaker cluster (SLES-HA Extension) on vmware vsphere 5. I've successfully configured and tested the stonith plugin "external/vcenter"; but this plugin introduces a single point of failure in my cluster infrastructure because it depends on the availability o