Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.6 order possible bug ?

2012-09-05 Thread Tomáš Vavřička
On 09/05/2012 04:54 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi, On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:09:15PM +0200, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: On 09/05/2012 11:44 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:51:35AM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: Hello,

Re: [Pacemaker] staggered startup

2012-09-05 Thread James Harper
> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:08 AM, James Harper > wrote: > > A power failure tonight indicated that my clustered resources (xen vm's) > have a dependency requirement like "make sure at least one domain > controller VM is fully up and running before starting any other windows > servers". Determi

Re: [Pacemaker] staggered startup

2012-09-05 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:08 AM, James Harper wrote: > A power failure tonight indicated that my clustered resources (xen vm's) have > a dependency requirement like "make sure at least one domain controller VM is > fully up and running before starting any other windows servers". Determining > a

Re: [Pacemaker] Mostly STONITH Questions / Seeking Best Practice

2012-09-05 Thread David Morton
Thanks for the feedback Lars ... more information / questions below: On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2012-09-04T16:31:54, David Morton wrote: > > > 1) I'm planning on implementing sfex resources (a small LVM volume on the > > same volume group as the data being pr

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.6 order possible bug ?

2012-09-05 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:09:15PM +0200, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: > On 09/05/2012 11:44 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:51:35AM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: Hello, Sorry If I send same question t

Re: [Pacemaker] staggered startup

2012-09-05 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
> A power failure tonight indicated that my clustered resources (xen vm's) > have a dependency requirement like "make sure at least one domain > controller VM is fully up and running before starting any other windows > servers". Determining a status of "fully up and running" is probably > complex s

[Pacemaker] staggered startup

2012-09-05 Thread James Harper
A power failure tonight indicated that my clustered resources (xen vm's) have a dependency requirement like "make sure at least one domain controller VM is fully up and running before starting any other windows servers". Determining a status of "fully up and running" is probably complex so as a

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.6 order possible bug ?

2012-09-05 Thread Tomáš Vavřička
On 09/05/2012 11:44 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:51:35AM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: Hello, Sorry If I send same question twice, but message did not appeared on mailing list. I have a problem with orders in pac

Re: [Pacemaker] Mostly STONITH Questions / Seeking Best Practice

2012-09-05 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-09-04T16:31:54, David Morton wrote: > 1) I'm planning on implementing sfex resources (a small LVM volume on the > same volume group as the data being protected) as an additional safety > feature along side the existing external/ipmi STONITH control ... is this > best practice in case the

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.6 order possible bug ?

2012-09-05 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:51:35AM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Sorry If I send same question twice, but message did not appeared on mailing > > list. > > > > I have a problem with orders in pacemaker 1.1.6 and corosync 1.4