Re: [Pacemaker] Pengine behavior

2012-07-11 Thread Виталий Давудов
David, thanks for your answer! I'll try to migrate to corosync. 11.07.2012 22:40, David Vossel пишет: - Original Message - From: "Виталий Давудов" To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 7:34:08 AM Subject: [Pacemaker] Pengine behavior Hi, list! I have con

[Pacemaker] Live migration question.

2012-07-11 Thread David Pendell
I have two cluster nodes that have a gigabit network between them for doing live migrations of running kvm VMs. If one of the two hosts go off line, naturally all of the guests then get restarted on the other host. But when the offline host then comes back online, all of the guests that were restar

Re: [Pacemaker] Service automatically restart after IP moving

2012-07-11 Thread David Vossel
- Original Message - > From: "CHAMLEY Stephane" > To: "pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org" > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 1:59:58 AM > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Service automatically restart after IP moving > > > > > > Nobody ? :S use an order constraint. http://www.clusterlabs.org/d

Re: [Pacemaker] Pengine behavior

2012-07-11 Thread David Vossel
- Original Message - > From: "Виталий Давудов" > To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 7:34:08 AM > Subject: [Pacemaker] Pengine behavior > > > Hi, list! > > I have configured cluster for voip application. > Here my configuration: > > # crm configure show

[Pacemaker] Orphaned resources

2012-07-11 Thread Thilo Uttendorfer
Hi, on several pacemaker clusters I sometimes see ORPHANED (DRBD) resources. In some cases they exist only for a short time and are automatically removed. But in other cases the resource will fail. "crm status" then looks like that: Master/Slave Set: ms-res1 [drbd-res1] drbd-res1:0 (o

[Pacemaker] Pengine behavior

2012-07-11 Thread Виталий Давудов
Hi, list! I have configured cluster for voip application. Here my configuration: # crm configure show node $id="552f91eb-e70a-40a5-ac43-cb16e063fdba" freeswitch1 \ attributes standby="off" node $id="c86ab64d-26c4-4595-aa32-bf9d18f714e7" freeswitch2 \ attributes standby="off" prim

[Pacemaker] setting remote-clear-port not working?

2012-07-11 Thread Nikola Ciprich
Hi, I'm tryig to get remote cib access working using http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Explained/ch-advanced-options.html and http://www.mail-archive.com/pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org/msg02373.html thread.. however I'm already having trouble with the first step - s

Re: [Pacemaker] Behavior booth when the temporary ACT site down happened.

2012-07-11 Thread Jiaju Zhang
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 17:46 +0900, Yuichi SEINO wrote: > Hi Jiaju, > > 2012/7/11 Jiaju Zhang : > > On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 11:47 +0900, Yuichi SEINO wrote: > >> Hi Jiaju, > >> > >> My environment consist of Site A, Site B, and Site C(Arbitrator). And > >> I granted a ticket to Site A. And then I exe

Re: [Pacemaker] drbd under pacemaker - always get split brain

2012-07-11 Thread Nikola Ciprich
> Well, I'd expect that to be safer as your current configuration ... > discard-zero-changes will never overwrite data automatically have > you tried adding the start-delay to DRBD start operation? I'm curious if > that is already sufficient for your problem. Hi, tried (I hope it's the sett

Re: [Pacemaker] Behavior booth when the temporary ACT site down happened.

2012-07-11 Thread Yuichi SEINO
Hi Jiaju, 2012/7/11 Jiaju Zhang : > On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 11:47 +0900, Yuichi SEINO wrote: >> Hi Jiaju, >> >> My environment consist of Site A, Site B, and Site C(Arbitrator). And >> I granted a ticket to Site A. And then I execute Site A down. >> Secondly, I start up Site A within the expire date

Re: [Pacemaker] drbd under pacemaker - always get split brain

2012-07-11 Thread Andreas Kurz
On 07/11/2012 09:23 AM, Nikola Ciprich wrote: >>> It really really looks like Pacemaker is too fast when promoting to >>> primary ... before the connection to the already up second node can be >>> established. >> >> Do you mean we're violating a constraint? >> Or is it a problem of the RA returning

Re: [Pacemaker] drbd under pacemaker - always get split brain

2012-07-11 Thread Andreas Kurz
On 07/11/2012 04:50 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Andreas Kurz wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Nikola Ciprich >> wrote: >>> Hello Andreas, Why not using the RA that comes with the resource-agent package? >>> well, I've historically used my scripts, h

Re: [Pacemaker] drbd under pacemaker - always get split brain

2012-07-11 Thread Nikola Ciprich
> > It really really looks like Pacemaker is too fast when promoting to > > primary ... before the connection to the already up second node can be > > established. > > Do you mean we're violating a constraint? > Or is it a problem of the RA returning too soon? dunno, I tried older drbd userspaces

Re: [Pacemaker] Service automatically restart after IP moving

2012-07-11 Thread CHAMLEY Stephane
Nobody ? :S From: CHAMLEY Stephane Sent: lundi 9 juillet 2012 17:28 To: 'pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org' Subject: Service automatically restart after IP moving Hello, I can not find anywhere an example configuration to achieve this... :( -> I currently have a CRM cluster with 3 nodes that share