Hi Jiaju,
This problem log put in bugzilla.
http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5081
2012/7/11 Jiaju Zhang :
> Anyway, please give me the debug log as last time to see if it is really
> a bug or not;)
>
> Thanks,
> Jiaju
>
--
Yuichi SEINO
METROSYSTEMS CORPORATION
E-mail:seino.clust...
I know this thread is over a year old and you may not care anymore,
but I was never satisfied with the answers I gave, so it stayed on my
todo list.
I've done some work recently improving the function for detecting when
to fence nodes and gracefully handling any non-pacemaker nodes that
are part o
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 11:47 +0900, Yuichi SEINO wrote:
> Hi Jiaju,
>
> My environment consist of Site A, Site B, and Site C(Arbitrator). And
> I granted a ticket to Site A. And then I execute Site A down.
> Secondly, I start up Site A within the expire date. then the state of
> Site A is that the
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 11:01 +0900, Yuichi SEINO wrote:
> Hi Jiaju,
>
> My environment consist of Site A, Site B, and Site C(Arbitrator). And
> I granted a ticket to Site A. And then I caused the network failure
> between Site A and Site B. Then the following behavior became.
>
> Firstly, all site
Hi Andrew,
> I think you already did right?
Yes, it has been already applied with the following histories by a patch of
Matsuo-san.
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/a92958fc16dc196b8024294be23a6142b6f21479
Regards,
tomo
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:46:20 +1000
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
I don't believe openais is supported (or indeed possible) with corosync 2.x
The corosync mailing list should be able to advise you on your options.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Errol Neal wrote:
> Hi. I'm following the instructions on the clusterlabs site to build all the
> cluster components
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Andreas Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Nikola Ciprich
> wrote:
>> Hello Andreas,
>>> Why not using the RA that comes with the resource-agent package?
>> well, I've historically used my scripts, haven't even noticed when LVM
>> resource appeared.. I
Hi Jiaju,
My environment consist of Site A, Site B, and Site C(Arbitrator). And
I granted a ticket to Site A. And then I execute Site A down.
Secondly, I start up Site A within the expire date. then the state of
Site A is that the ticket is revoked. So Site B is granted after the
ticket expired.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:22 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is RHEL6 in the target platform of pacemaker-1.1 ?
>
> The following errors occur when they build in RHEL6.
> --
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> xml.c: In function 'sorted_xml':
> xml.c:1967: error: implicit declaration of function 'g
Hi Jiaju,
My environment consist of Site A, Site B, and Site C(Arbitrator). And
I granted a ticket to Site A. And then I caused the network failure
between Site A and Site B. Then the following behavior became.
Firstly, all site is revoked. Secondly, Site A is granted.
I would like to know if th
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Nikola Ciprich
wrote:
> Hello Andreas,
>> Why not using the RA that comes with the resource-agent package?
> well, I've historically used my scripts, haven't even noticed when LVM
> resource appeared.. I switched to it now.., thanks for the hint..
>> this "become-p
This is what we did (spoiler: no pacemaker)
We connect the openvpn-hosts via tinc (could also be openvpn but tinc is
more flexible when servers both initiate the connection) and put these
tunnels into a bridge (with stp).
Then all these nodes have openvpn with server-certificates from the same
ca
On 2012-07-10T14:58:31, emmanuel segura wrote:
> conntrackd - Connection tracking daemon
Syncing the state of a VPN is, due to the encryption, significantly more
difficult than just TCP/IP state. The reconnect/keepalive option is
really the best path forward.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect S
conntrackd - Connection tracking daemon
2012/7/10 Michael Schwartzkopff
> > Hi there!
> >
> > OpenVPN server has an 'management interface' that allows the admin to
> > delete, add, modify, authorize client connections.
> >
> > As far as I know, it doesn't exist any preestablished method for
> >
>
> >* Hi there!*>* *>* OpenVPN server has an 'management interface' that allows
> >the admin to*>* delete, add, modify, authorize client connections.*>* *>* As
> >far as I know, it doesn't exist any preestablished method for*>* sharing
> >connections between openvpn servers, so in issues like*>
> Hi there!
>
> OpenVPN server has an 'management interface' that allows the admin to
> delete, add, modify, authorize client connections.
>
> As far as I know, it doesn't exist any preestablished method for
> sharing connections between openvpn servers, so in issues like
> failover and/or active
Hi there!
OpenVPN server has an 'management interface' that allows the admin to
delete, add, modify, authorize client connections.
As far as I know, it doesn't exist any preestablished method for
sharing connections between openvpn servers, so in issues like
failover and/or active-active configur
17 matches
Mail list logo
