Re: [Pacemaker] [Problem] Order is ignored, and promote is carried out.

2012-07-01 Thread renayama19661014
Hi All, The constitution of the cluster became right by a redundant resource and addition and a change of the limitation as follows. However, we do not want to perform the redundant setting. (snip)

Re: [Pacemaker] [Problem] Order is ignored, and promote is carried out.

2012-07-01 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Phillip, Thank you for comment. However, the result was the same even if I used the Group resource. (snip) (snip) (snip) Last updated: Mon Jul 2 17:56:27 2012 Stack: Heartbeat Current DC: rh62-test1 (6d

Re: [Pacemaker] Cluster issues - all resources restarting when a node reboots

2012-07-01 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Velayutham, Prakash wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a test case with ocf::Pacemaker::Dummy resources. Without the status section, its not a test case we can use. Which is why I said: >> perhaps file a bug and attach a crm_report >> (run with --help) covering the time of

Re: [Pacemaker] newb - stonith not working - require others to stonith node

2012-07-01 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Brett Lee wrote: > Hello - Am thinking that this is progress. > > Have made some updates, but still getting the same result ("require others > to stonith node st15-mds1"). We'd still need to see a hb_report containing the logs and PE files before we can comment.

Re: [Pacemaker] A processor joined or left the membership and a new membership was formed.

2012-07-01 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Hugo Deprez wrote: > Thank you for the information I'll change the configuration and see > what will happen. > Hard to troubleshoot network issue. > I didn't detect any packets losts. > > Running cluster on VM seems a bit tricky. What might be happening is that the

Re: [Pacemaker] A processor joined or left the membership and a new membership was formed.

2012-07-01 Thread Hugo Deprez
Thank you for the information I'll change the configuration and see what will happen. Hard to troubleshoot network issue. I didn't detect any packets losts. Running cluster on VM seems a bit tricky. On 28 June 2012 04:42, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Hugo Deprez wro