Re: [Pacemaker] newb - stonith not working - require others to stonith node

2012-06-29 Thread Brett Lee
Hello -Am thinking that this is progress. Have made some updates, but still getting the same result ("require others to stonith node st15-mds1"). Referencing this link for the updates made: http://www.hastexo.com/resources/hints-and-kinks/fencing-libvirtkvm-virtualized-cluster-nodes Updates in

Re: [Pacemaker] Empty log messages

2012-06-29 Thread emmanuel segura
change to_syslog: yes to to_syslog: no like that you put all your logs in /var/log/corosync.log 2012/6/29 Arnold Krille > Hi all, > > this is a strange problem I seem to have: What pacemaker/corosync logs to > rsyslog has deamon-names, severity-levels but no messages. So I see a lot > of > entr

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource is monitored only till promote... bug or config error?

2012-06-29 Thread David Vossel
- Original Message - > From: "Andreas Stallmann" > To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:05:06 AM > Subject: [Pacemaker] Resource is monitored only till promote... bug or > config error? > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > For some yet unknown rea

Re: [Pacemaker] resources not migrating when some are not runnable on one node, maybe because of groups or master/slave clones?

2012-06-29 Thread Phil Frost
On 06/28/2012 01:29 PM, David Vossel wrote: I've been looking into multistate resource colocations quite a bit this week. I have a branch I'm working with that may improve this situation for you. If you are feeling brave, test this branch out with your configuration and see if it fairs better

[Pacemaker] newb - stonith not working - require others to stonith node

2012-06-29 Thread Brett Lee
Hi - Am new to pacemaker and now have a shiny new configuration that will not stonith.  This is a test system using KVM and external/libvirt - all VMs are running CentOS 5. Am (really) hoping someone might be willing to help troubleshoot this configuration.  Thank you for your time and effor

Re: [Pacemaker] Different Corosync Rings for Different Nodes in Same Cluster?

2012-06-29 Thread Steven Dake
On 06/29/2012 01:42 AM, Dan Frincu wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Andrew Martin wrote: >> Hi Dan, >> >> Thanks for the help. If I configure the network as I described - ring 0 as >> the network all 3 nodes are on, ring 1 as the network only 2 of the nodes >> are on, and using "

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource is monitored only till promote... bug or config error?

2012-06-29 Thread David Vossel
- Original Message - > From: "Andreas Stallmann" > To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:05:06 AM > Subject: [Pacemaker] Resource is monitored only till promote... bug or > config error? > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > For some yet unknown rea

Re: [Pacemaker] Empty log messages

2012-06-29 Thread Arnold Krille
On Friday 29 June 2012 13:13:37 Arnold Krille wrote: > this is a strange problem I seem to have: What pacemaker/corosync logs to > rsyslog has deamon-names, severity-levels but no messages. So I see a lot of > entries in the logs, I see where they come from and whether the are > important but I don

[Pacemaker] Empty log messages

2012-06-29 Thread Arnold Krille
Hi all, this is a strange problem I seem to have: What pacemaker/corosync logs to rsyslog has deamon-names, severity-levels but no messages. So I see a lot of entries in the logs, I see where they come from and whether the are important but I don't see the messages themselv. That is the parts t

Re: [Pacemaker] [Problem] Order is ignored, and promote is carried out.

2012-06-29 Thread Phillip Frost
On Jun 28, 2012, at 10:26 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: >> We set order limitation as follows. > > with-rsc="msPostgresql" with-rsc-role="Master"/> > score="INFINITY" then="msPostgresql" then-action="promote"/> > >> However, promote was carried out even if primitvei resource

Re: [Pacemaker] Different Corosync Rings for Different Nodes in Same Cluster?

2012-06-29 Thread Dan Frincu
Hi, On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Andrew Martin wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Thanks for the help. If I configure the network as I described - ring 0 as > the network all 3 nodes are on, ring 1 as the network only 2 of the nodes > are on, and using "passive" - and the ring 0 network goes down, corosync