Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comment.
All right.
We wait for a correction.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Thu, 2012/6/28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:33 PM, wrote:
> > Hi All,
> ...
> > I registered these contents with Bugzilla.
> > * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/sh
Hi Andrew,
All right.
We wait for a correction.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Thu, 2012/6/28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:27 PM, wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I registered these contents with Bugzilla.
> > * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5074
>
> Ex
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Velayutham, Prakash
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Below is the relevant part of my CIB. I am facing 2 issues.
>
> 1. Every time a node in the cluster reboots, all resources get restarted in
> the entire cluster.
> 2. I have a time-based rule for stickiness, but it does
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:04 PM, coma wrote:
> Thank for your reply Andreas,
>
> My fisrt node is a virtual machine (active node), the second (passive node)
> is physical standalone server, there is no high load on any of them but the
> problem seems to come from the virtual server.
> I actually h
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:27 PM, wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I registered these contents with Bugzilla.
> * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5074
Excellent, thankyou!
David and I have almost finished our "break everything and put it back
together" phase, we'll be diving back into bug report
One of the things on my todo list for 1.2 is to unify the various sets
of custom error codes in pacemaker into a single set of codes with a
single error-to-text function.
LSB and OCF return codes are the obvious exception here.
Where possible I will be using standard system error codes from errno.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Brian J. Murrell
> wrote:
>> On 12-06-26 09:54 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> The DC, possibly you didn't have one at that moment in time.
>>
>> It was the DC in fact. I restarted corosync on that node
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Brian J. Murrell
wrote:
> On 12-06-26 09:54 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> The DC, possibly you didn't have one at that moment in time.
>
> It was the DC in fact. I restarted corosync on that node and the
> timeouts went away. But note I "re"started, not starte
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:33 PM, wrote:
> Hi All,
...
> I registered these contents with Bugzilla.
> * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5070
Excellent. I believe David has been looking into this already.
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacem
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Maurits van de Lande
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I have been testing a classic pacemaker+corosync cluster for virtualization
> but it was lacking a cluster filesystem to host the virtual machine config
> files. (I was using the guidelines I found at Linbit to setup a
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:51 PM, David Coulson wrote:
> I've a couple of cloned resources which need to be restarted one at a time
> as part of a batch process.
>
> If I do a 'crm -w resource restart cl-whatever', it restarts the whole lot
> at once. I can do a 'service appname stop' on each box,
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Hugo Deprez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I guess this as laready been raised but I do have the following
> message on some of my clusters :
>
> Jun 24 12:00:02 server corosync[27089]: [TOTEM ] A processor joined
> or left the membership and a new membership was formed.
>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Luca Meron wrote:
>
>> I don't mean in the cluster config, I mean actual processes.
>
> no, for sure not.
you say 'no', but the next sentence indicates that the answer is 'yes'.
> but for these resource I have problems because they're detected as too
> active. v
Hi Jake,
On Jun 27, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Jake Smith wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Prakash Velayutham"
>> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 4:06:39 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time-based resource stickiness not working cleanly
>>
>>
- Original Message -
> From: "Prakash Velayutham"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 4:06:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time-based resource stickiness not working cleanly
>
> I created a simple IPaddr2 resource for this testing.
>
> 1. I
I created a simple IPaddr2 resource for this testing.
1. I can confirm that this resource (with just a location preference constraint
and nothing else) does not get restarted when a node reboots. So must be
something with the clone/group resources. Not sure how to debug right now.
2. I have a ti
I am all for testing, but looks like our database person wants this completed
now. I will test this in our dev. environment soon.
Thanks,
Prakash
On Jun 27, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Phil Frost wrote:
> On 06/27/2012 02:33 PM, Velayutham, Prakash wrote:
>> and the cluster works fine, except that when t
On 06/27/2012 02:33 PM, Velayutham, Prakash wrote:
and the cluster works fine, except that when the fenced (STONITHed) node comes
back up and joins the cluster, all resources (including the one that is running
in its preferred location) gets restarted.
This is annoying and I am trying to find
As some may know, Angus and I were working previously on a project
called pacemaker-cloud, with the intention of adding high availbility to
guests in cloud environments. We stopped developing that project in
March 2012 and took our experiences to a new project called Heat. For
more details of why
Yeah, after reading that doc is why I went with the original config that I had.
I am having to run 2 MySQL instances each on its own OCFS2 volume. The volumes
are mounted on both the nodes, but I have location preference so 1 instance
runs on each node if possible. I am able to test all scenario
On 06/26/2012 04:33 PM, Velayutham, Prakash wrote:
Any idea? Can a resource order constraint be specified depending on a
primitive that is part of a clone resource? Is that even supported?
Probably not. Usually you'd want to have your constraints reference the
clone, not the primitive behind i
Hello all,
Below is the relevant part of my CIB. I am facing 2 issues.
1. Every time a node in the cluster reboots, all resources get restarted in the
entire cluster.
2. I have a time-based rule for stickiness, but it does not work.
Can any one point out what is wrong with the configuration?
On 06/27/2012 12:38 PM, Stallmann, Andreas wrote:
I let the tomcat script write some quite elaborate debug output, which
NEVER shows an attempt to promote the resource. Any ideas?
Does your RA call crm_master? Otherwise you will have to include
location constraints in your configuration statin
Hi again,
I’m still working on my tomcat master/slave resource-script.
Well... the script works fine, as far as ocf-tester can be believed. start /
stop / status / monitor / promote and demote are implemented and seem to work,
when called from ocf-tester.
Now I integradet the resource in crm l
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 22:14 +0900, Yuichi SEINO wrote:
> Hi Jiaju,
>
> I several times tested the failure of node by this structure.
> This case is probably caused when the node having a ticket was
> fail-over in two nodes.
> I hope to early be resolve this problem.
OK, I'm going to look into thi
On 12-06-26 09:54 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> The DC, possibly you didn't have one at that moment in time.
It was the DC in fact. I restarted corosync on that node and the
timeouts went away. But note I "re"started, not started. It was
running at the time, just not properly, apparently.
> W
Hi Jiaju,
I several times tested the failure of node by this structure.
This case is probably caused when the node having a ticket was
fail-over in two nodes.
I hope to early be resolve this problem.
Sincerely,
Yuichi
2012/6/21 Jiaju Zhang :
> On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 16:40 +0900, Yuichi SEINO wrot
Thank for your reply Andreas,
My fisrt node is a virtual machine (active node), the second (passive node)
is physical standalone server, there is no high load on any of them but the
problem seems to come from the virtual server.
I actually have the same problem of split brain when I take or delet
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Martin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am setting up a 3 node cluster with Corosync + Pacemaker on Ubuntu 12.04
> server. Two of the nodes are "real" nodes, while the 3rd is in standby mode
> as a quorum node. The two "real" nodes each have two NICs, one that is
Thank for the link emmanuel, it seems to be a solution for my problem, i
will test it!
2012/6/26 emmanuel segura
> Look here
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Explained/ch09s03s03.html
>
> :-)
>
> 2012/6/26 coma
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> i running on a 2 node cluste
30 matches
Mail list logo
