On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> I've added the concept of a 'system service' that expands to whatever
> standard the local machine supports.
> So you could say, in xml,
> and the cluster would use 'lsb' on RHEL, 'upstart' on Ubuntu and 'systemd' on
> newer fedora relea
Seems like bug http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5040 and and
earlier thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.highavailability.pacemaker/13185/focus=13321
According to that bug, 1.4.3 may have solved it, yet still open and a
comment from Andrew Beekhof saying he'd reproduced agai
On 06/25/2012 06:14 PM, Stallmann, Andreas wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>
> We are currently switching from mysql-on-drbd with tomcat and a shared
> IP to mysql-master-slave with tomcat-master-slave and shared IP and an
> additonal cloned service (activemq).
>
>
>
> Up until now we had quite an easy se
On 06/25/2012 12:14 PM, Stallmann, Andreas wrote:
but crm won’t let me put Master/Slave resource into a group. Why is that?
I don't think it's possible to specify the state a resource must be in
(master) within a group constraint. However, groups are just (modulo
bugs) shorthand for order and
ms_MySQL:Master it's not a resource just one state
2012/6/25 Stallmann, Andreas
> Hi!
>
> ** **
>
> We are currently switching from mysql-on-drbd with tomcat and a shared IP
> to mysql-master-slave with tomcat-master-slave and shared IP and an
> additonal cloned service (activemq).
>
On 25/06/12 16:56, Sergey Tachenov wrote:
>> ms ms_nfs ms_dummy \
>> meta target-role="Master" master-max="1" master-node="1"
> Shouldn't that be master-node-max, not just master-node?
master-node or master-node-max hasn't made any differences. Will look
into these two parameters though
On 25/06/12 16:56, Phil Frost wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 11:48 AM, Regendoerp, Achim wrote:
>> As it is currently, both nodes are online and configured, but none are
>> switching to Master. In lack of a DRBD resource, I tried using the Dummy
>> Pacemaker. If that's not the correct RA, please enlighten
Hi!
We are currently switching from mysql-on-drbd with tomcat and a shared IP to
mysql-master-slave with tomcat-master-slave and shared IP and an additonal
cloned service (activemq).
Up until now we had quite an easy setup – especially for the admins who did the
daily maintenance. All services
On 06/25/2012 05:48 PM, Regendoerp, Achim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently looking at two VMs which are supposed to mount a drive in
> a given directory, depending on who's the master. This was decided above
> me, therefore no DRBD stuff (which would've made things easier), but
> still using corosyn
On 06/25/2012 11:48 AM, Regendoerp, Achim wrote:
As it is currently, both nodes are online and configured, but none are
switching to Master. In lack of a DRBD resource, I tried using the Dummy
Pacemaker. If that's not the correct RA, please enlighten me on this too.
To simulate a DRBD resource,
ms ms_nfs ms_dummy \
meta target-role="Master" master-max="1" master-node="1"
Shouldn't that be master-node-max, not just master-node?
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacema
Hi,
I'm currently looking at two VMs which are supposed to mount a drive in
a given directory, depending on who's the master. This was decided above
me, therefore no DRBD stuff (which would've made things easier), but
still using corosync/pacemaker to do the cluster work.
As it is currently, both
I've a couple of cloned resources which need to be restarted one at a
time as part of a batch process.
If I do a 'crm -w resource restart cl-whatever', it restarts the whole
lot at once. I can do a 'service appname stop' on each box, wait for
pacemaker to notice it is down, then let it restart
I've added the concept of a 'system service' that expands to whatever standard
the local machine supports.
So you could say, in xml,
and the cluster would use 'lsb' on RHEL, 'upstart' on Ubuntu and 'systemd' on
newer fedora releases.
Handy if you have a mixed cluster.
My question is, what to c
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Deepshikha Singh
wrote:
> which algorithm is used for dc node selection who takes decisions regaring
> services??
there is an election process.
why do you think you need to influence it?
>
> ___
> Pacemaker mailing
Dear Fiorenza:
I have the same problem with you. I checked the newest ethmonitor
ra (ClusterLabs-resource-agents-v3.9.2-0-ge261943.tar). It's same with
my sles 11 sp2.
Failed actions:
p_ethmonitor:1_monitor_15000 (node=sles11264-node1, call=1591,
rc=-2, status=Timed Out): unknown exec e
16 matches
Mail list logo
