Re: [Pacemaker] epel version of rpm pacemaker-1.1.7

2012-05-14 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Larry Brigman wrote: > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Larry Brigman >> wrote: >>> I must be coming to the party late.  I just noticed that 1.1.7 version >>> of pacemaker is out. >>> We are running 1.1.5 o

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.7 build failed.

2012-05-14 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Parshvi wrote: > Andrew Beekhof writes: > >> >> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Parshvi wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I am upgrading the HA packages to the higher versions. The build failed of >> > Pacemaker, with the following error: >> > >> > cc1: warnings being treate

Re: [Pacemaker] Removed nodes showing back in status

2012-05-14 Thread Larry Brigman
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:13 PM, David Vossel wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Larry Brigman" >> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" >> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 1:30:22 PM >> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Removed nodes showing back in status >> >> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:5

Re: [Pacemaker] Removed nodes showing back in status

2012-05-14 Thread David Vossel
- Original Message - > From: "Larry Brigman" > To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 1:30:22 PM > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Removed nodes showing back in status > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Larry Brigman > wrote: > > I have a 5 node cluster (bu

[Pacemaker] ocfs2_controld.pcmk process issue

2012-05-14 Thread Matthew O'Connor
Hi! I ran into the issue of ocfs2_controld.pcmk consuming vast CPU again - twice, actually. The most recent happenstance was after a multi-node failure. One node stayed alive, two nodes had to be rebooted. After the reboots, one of the two came back without issue, and was able to mount the OCFS

Re: [Pacemaker] epel version of rpm pacemaker-1.1.7

2012-05-14 Thread Larry Brigman
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Larry Brigman wrote: >> I must be coming to the party late.  I just noticed that 1.1.7 version >> of pacemaker is out. >> We are running 1.1.5 on centos5 and would like to upgrade to 1.1.7 but I >> am not find

Re: [Pacemaker] Removed nodes showing back in status

2012-05-14 Thread Larry Brigman
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Larry Brigman wrote: > I have a 5 node cluster (but it could be any number of nodes, 3 or larger). > I am testing some scripts for node removal. > I remove a node from the cluster and everything looks correct from crm > status standpoint. > When I remove a second n

[Pacemaker] Removed nodes showing back in status

2012-05-14 Thread Larry Brigman
I have a 5 node cluster (but it could be any number of nodes, 3 or larger). I am testing some scripts for node removal. I remove a node from the cluster and everything looks correct from crm status standpoint. When I remove a second node, the first node that was removed now shows back in the crm st

Re: [Pacemaker] VIP on Active/Active cluster

2012-05-14 Thread Jake Smith
- Original Message - > From: "Paul Damken" > To: pacema...@clusterlabs.org > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 9:45:30 AM > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] VIP on Active/Active cluster > > Jake Smith writes: > > > > > > > clone-node-max="2" should only be one.  How about the output from > > crm_

Re: [Pacemaker] VIP on Active/Active cluster

2012-05-14 Thread David Coulson
Cloning IPAddr2 resources utilizes the iptables CLUSTERIP rule. Probably a good idea to start looking at it w/ tcpdump and seeing if either box gets the icmp echo-request packet (from a ping) and determining if it just doesn't respond properly, doesn't get it at all, or something else. I'd say

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker is not able to read new shadow CIB.

2012-05-14 Thread Guillaume Belrose
Hi Dejan, I log in Fedora (Gnome) desktop as myself (i.e. guillaume) and then I switch (in the terminal) to root using su. In my system, the USER variable is actually set to guillaume and not root. So this might be where the problem is. Anyway, I eventually added a symbolic link making /root/.cib

Re: [Pacemaker] VIP on Active/Active cluster

2012-05-14 Thread Paul Damken
Jake Smith writes: > > > clone-node-max="2" should only be one.  How about the output from crm_mon - fr1And ip a s on each node? Jake > - Reply message -From: "Paul Damken" gmail.com>To: oss.clusterlabs.org>Subject: [Pacemaker] VIP on Active/Active clusterDate: Sat, May 12, 2012 2:4

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker strange behaviour

2012-05-14 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 06:05:27PM +0300, Spiros Ioannou wrote: > Hello all, > Corosync/pacemaker with 3 nodes(vserver1, vserver2, vserver3), 28 resources > defined, with quorum, stonith (via ipmi/ilo). > Most of the time all these work correctly but when we shutdown servers and > try to resta

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker is not able to read new shadow CIB.

2012-05-14 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 03:45:43PM +0100, Guillaume Belrose wrote: > I am running as root. > > The shadow file gets created under /var/lib/heartbeat/crm and is owned by > root. Strange. I think that most users run crm as root and I'd expect a general outcry if creating shadow cibs didn't work.

Re: [Pacemaker] new node causes spurious evil

2012-05-14 Thread Matthew O'Connor
Hi! Thanks for your reply! That makes perfect sense. Thanks again!! -- Matt On 5/14/2012 10:44 AM, David Vossel wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Matthew O'Connor" >> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" >> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 11:49:04 PM >> Subject: [Pacemaker] n

Re: [Pacemaker] Why monitor fails in my RA

2012-05-14 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 01:01:48PM +0200, Greg wrote: > W dniu 05/09/12 13:57, Dejan Muhamedagic pisze: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:41:05PM +0200, Greg wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I try to write redis resources agent working in master-slave. My >> >> Are you aware of a pull request for o

Re: [Pacemaker] new node causes spurious evil

2012-05-14 Thread David Vossel
- Original Message - > From: "Matthew O'Connor" > To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 11:49:04 PM > Subject: [Pacemaker] new node causes spurious evil > > My question: Why will a node that is not allowed to start a resource > attempt to start a moni

Re: [Pacemaker] Why monitor fails in my RA

2012-05-14 Thread Greg
W dniu 05/09/12 13:57, Dejan Muhamedagic pisze: Hi, On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:41:05PM +0200, Greg wrote: Hi, I try to write redis resources agent working in master-slave. My Are you aware of a pull request for one redis resource agent: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/3

Re: [Pacemaker] Why monitor fails in my RA

2012-05-14 Thread Greg
W dniu 05/09/12 13:57, Dejan Muhamedagic pisze: Hi, On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:41:05PM +0200, Greg wrote: Hi, I try to write redis resources agent working in master-slave. My Are you aware of a pull request for one redis resource agent: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/3

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about behavior when pacemakerd was terminated

2012-05-14 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Andrew, I reported it in Bugzilla. Please confirm it. * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5064 Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (12.05.09 16:12), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi, I am using Pacemaker-1.1 (devel: db5e167). When stonith

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about crmsh

2012-05-14 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Dejan, Thanks for your reply. I opened an enhancement request. Please confirm it. * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5065 Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (12.05.11 23:20), Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi Kazunori-san, On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 08:31:51PM +0900, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi