[Pacemaker] on-fail is not effective

2012-04-05 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi, I am using Pacemaker-1.1 (devel: 7172b7323bb72c51999ce11c6fa5d3ff0a0a4b4f). The setting of "on-fail" does not become effective. For example, it becomes default action("restart") even if it specifies "stop". [root@vm1 ~]# crm configure show | grep -A3 "primitive prmDummy1" primitive prmDummy1

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker+ocfs2 +RAC

2012-04-05 Thread Florian Haas
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Ruwan Fernando wrote: > Hi, > > I was required to build oracle cluster so I configured pacemaker+ > corosync+drbd+ocfs2 and built Active-active cluster. Why? pacemaker+corosync+drbd+xfs+oracle works just fine and is fully integrated with Pacemaker. RAC is primari

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker+ocfs2 +RAC

2012-04-05 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-04-02T10:30:37, Ruwan Fernando wrote: > I was required to build oracle cluster so I configured pacemaker+ > corosync+drbd+ocfs2 and built Active-active cluster.Then I found that > to make databases in OCFS2 I have to install Oracle RAC. I have > problem with understanding What is the diff

Re: [Pacemaker] Cluster with DRBD : split brain

2012-04-05 Thread Andreas Kurz
On 04/04/2012 03:40 PM, Hugo Deprez wrote: > Hello, > > thanks for the information. > I was looking at this page > http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-pacemaker-fencing.html > I did specify the following handlers : > handlers { > fence-peer "/usr/lib/drbd/crm-fence-peer.sh"; > after