What's the meanings of "native_color","group_color","clone_color" and so
on,when I use crm_simulate -L -s to calculate the scores of the cluster
resource? And difference ? I am looking forward to your reply.___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clus
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2012-03-20T11:42:08, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> > I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when
>> > transition is aborted (due to CIB change) in the middle of the resource
>> > migration.
>> >
>> > That is:
On 03/22/2012 07:24 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>
> Andreas wrote:
>>
>> On 03/22/2012 04:47 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> thanks for the quick response. So the data is not destroyed if two
>>> identicals VM's access the LV simultaneouslay ? I thought
>>> it would be. I
>>> will have stoni
On 03/22/2012 07:04 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Andreas schrieb:
>>
>> On 03/22/2012 04:47 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> thanks for the quick response. So the data is not destroyed if two
>>> identicals VM's access the LV simultaneouslay ? I thought
>>> it would be. I
>>> will
Andreas wrote:
>
> On 03/22/2012 04:47 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > thanks for the quick response. So the data is not destroyed if two
> > identicals VM's access the LV simultaneouslay ? I thought
> > it would be. I
> > will have stonith too.
> > What is about live migration ? Is it po
Hi,
Andreas schrieb:
>
> On 03/22/2012 04:47 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > thanks for the quick response. So the data is not destroyed if two
> > identicals VM's access the LV simultaneouslay ? I thought
> > it would be. I
> > will have stonith too.
> > What is about live migration ? I
One lvm vg in exclusive mode means just one node at time can access to the
data
Il giorno 22 marzo 2012 16:47, Lentes, Bernd <
bernd.len...@helmholtz-muenchen.de> ha scritto:
> **
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the quick response. So the data is not destroyed if two
> identicals VM's access the LV simult
On 03/22/2012 04:47 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the quick response. So the data is not destroyed if two
> identicals VM's access the LV simultaneouslay ? I thought it would be. I
> will have stonith too.
> What is about live migration ? Is it possible with my setup ?
Well, if y
Hi,
thanks for the quick response. So the data is not destroyed if two identicals
VM's access the LV simultaneouslay ? I thought it would be. I will have stonith
too.
What is about live migration ? Is it possible with my setup ?
Bernd
--
Bernd Lentes
Systemadministration
Institut für Entwic
if you have in you cluster vg exclusive="yes" and remember it's good idea
have stonith configured
Il giorno 22 marzo 2012 15:52, Lentes, Bernd <
bernd.len...@helmholtz-muenchen.de> ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> i'd like to establish a 2 Node-Cluster. My OS will be SLES 11 and HAE. My
> services will run
Hi,
sorry, i forgot something. Is live-migration possible with the explained setup ?
Bernd
===
Hi,
i'd like to establish a 2 Node-Cluster. My OS will be SLES 11 and HAE. My
services will run in VM's using KVM. I will
Hi,
i'd like to establish a 2 Node-Cluster. My OS will be SLES 11 and HAE. My
services will run in VM's using KVM. I will install the VM's in LV's, one LV
for one VM. The LV's will be plain partitions, having no filesystem. I have
read this is quicker with KVM than installing a VM in a LV with
On 03/22/2012 03:23 PM, coma wrote:
> Thank you for your responses,
>
> I have added the migration-treshold on my mysqld ressource, when i kill
> or manually stop mysql on one node, there is not failover on the second
> node.
> Also, when i look crm_mon --failcounts, i can see "mysqld:
> migration
put migration-thresold global in your cluster property
Il giorno 22 marzo 2012 15:23, coma ha scritto:
> Thank you for your responses,
>
> I have added the migration-treshold on my mysqld ressource, when i kill or
> manually stop mysql on one node, there is not failover on the second node.
> Als
Thank you for your responses,
I have added the migration-treshold on my mysqld ressource, when i kill or
manually stop mysql on one node, there is not failover on the second node.
Also, when i look crm_mon --failcounts, i can see "mysqld:
migration-threshold=100 fail-count=100", so i don"t
On 03/22/2012 01:51 PM, coma wrote:
> Ah yes thank you, the service status mysql is now monitored, but the
> failover is not performed?
As long as local restarts are successful there is no need for a failover
... there is migration-treshold to limit local restart tries.
Regards,
Andreas
--
Need
if you set migration-thresold=2 after two operation fail-count it's
reached your resource trys to switch to an other node
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.0/html/Pacemaker_Explained/s-failure-migration.html
Il giorno 22 marzo 2012 13:51, coma ha scritto:
> Ah yes thank you, th
Ah yes thank you, the service status mysql is now monitored, but the
failover is not performed?
2012/3/22 emmanuel segura
> sorry
> I think you missed the op monitor operetion in your primitive definition
>
>
>
> Il giorno 22 marzo 2012 11:52, emmanuel segura ha
> scritto:
>
> I think you mis
Hello,
I try to use the ocf:heartbeat:conntrackd resource on a CentOS 6 two nodes
cluster. I don't understant how works the conntrackd resource, I configured it
as explained in documentation, and start a conntrackd daemon whith an lsb
script. When I try a takeover, the resource kill the daemon
On 3/22/12 5:09 AM, Ante Karamatic wrote:
Hi
I've came across an odd behavior, which might be considered as
inconsistent. As we know, pacemaker doesn't allow deleting a resource
that's running, but this doesn't produce same behavior every time.
Let's take a VM with a default stop timeout (90
sorry
I think you missed the op monitor operetion in your primitive definition
Il giorno 22 marzo 2012 11:52, emmanuel segura ha
scritto:
> I think you missed the op monitor operetion you primitive definition
>
> Il giorno 22 marzo 2012 11:33, coma ha scritto:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a quest
I think you missed the op monitor operetion you primitive definition
Il giorno 22 marzo 2012 11:33, coma ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about mysql service monitoring into a MySQL HA cluster
> with pacemaker and DRBD,
> I have set up a configuration to allow a failover between two no
Hello,
I have a question about mysql service monitoring into a MySQL HA cluster
with pacemaker and DRBD,
I have set up a configuration to allow a failover between two nodes, it
work fine when a node is offline (or standby), but i want to know if
it is possible
to monitor the mysql service to perfo
Hi All,
Sorry
My patch was wrong.
I send a right patch.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Thu, 2012/3/22, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The crmd-transition-delay waits for the update of the attribute to be late.
>
> However, crmd cannot realize the wait of the att
Hi
I've came across an odd behavior, which might be considered as
inconsistent. As we know, pacemaker doesn't allow deleting a resource
that's running, but this doesn't produce same behavior every time.
Let's take a VM with a default stop timeout (90 seconds).
First behavior
--
# cr
25 matches
Mail list logo
