On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> 2012/2/27 Ante Karamatić :
>>> On 27.02.2012 12:27, Florian Haas wrote:
>>>
Alas, to the best of my knowledge the only way to change a specific
job's respawn policy is by mod
25.02.2012 06:35, Atif Faheem wrote:
> Hi. I have been experimenting with resource scalability in Pacemaker. I
> started with no resources, and attempted to configure & start a few
> hundred dummy resources (a dummy ocf script that does not load the CPU)
> on a cluster of 4 virtual machines using c
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> 2012/2/27 Ante Karamatić :
>> On 27.02.2012 12:27, Florian Haas wrote:
>>
>>> Alas, to the best of my knowledge the only way to change a specific
>>> job's respawn policy is by modifying its job definition. Likewise,
>>> that's the only way
2012/2/27 Ante Karamatić :
> On 27.02.2012 12:27, Florian Haas wrote:
>
>> Alas, to the best of my knowledge the only way to change a specific
>> job's respawn policy is by modifying its job definition. Likewise,
>> that's the only way to enable or disable starting on system boot. So
>> there is a
2012/2/27 Ante Karamatić :
> On 27.02.2012 12:27, Florian Haas wrote:
>
>> Alas, to the best of my knowledge the only way to change a specific
>> job's respawn policy is by modifying its job definition. Likewise,
>> that's the only way to enable or disable starting on system boot. So
>> there is a
On Feb 24, 2012, at 8:07 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 02/23/12 23:48, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Ante Karamatic wrote:
>>> On 23.02.2012 00:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
Do you still have LSB scripts on a machine thats using upstart?
>>>
>>> Yes, some LSB scr
On 2012-02-27T16:07:24, Jean-Francois Malouin
wrote:
> How would you go about simulating a stonith device in a virtual
> cluster *without* involving the physical host, ie, just the guests?
> This is only for testing purposes btw.
If you have shared storage (virtual or not), external/sbd from
cl
On 27.02.2012 12:27, Florian Haas wrote:
> Alas, to the best of my knowledge the only way to change a specific
> job's respawn policy is by modifying its job definition. Likewise,
> that's the only way to enable or disable starting on system boot. So
> there is a way to overrule the package mainta
Hi. I have been experimenting with resource scalability in Pacemaker. I
started with no resources, and attempted to configure & start a few hundred
dummy resources (a dummy ocf script that does not load the CPU) on a
cluster of 4 virtual machines using crm configure, and noted that after
adding abo
Hi
I`m teaching some pacemaker features in my computer class
Reading de manual in
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Explained/s-resource-operations.html
I found some properties of opertions like 'requires' and 'on-fail' but I
cannot make them work in my pacemaker in
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:30 PM, wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for your patch.
>
> After I applied a patch, and testing, the problem seemed to be solved.
Ok, I'll apply to 1.1 and we can backport it.
> BTW, is crm_trace a function from pacemaker-1.1 ?
Correct.
> Because an error had o
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for your patch.
After I applied a patch, and testing, the problem seemed to be solved.
BTW, is crm_trace a function from pacemaker-1.1 ?
Because an error had occurred in build, crm_trace commented out and testing.
Regards,
Tomo
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:13:59 +1100
Andrew
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Gianluca Cecchi
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> for example at http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Install
>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/i386/epel-release-5-3.noarch.rpm
>> has to be changed now into
>>
Could you try the following patch:
diff --git a/lib/pengine/unpack.c b/lib/pengine/unpack.c
index 8890850..4fcd224 100644
--- a/lib/pengine/unpack.c
+++ b/lib/pengine/unpack.c
@@ -191,6 +191,15 @@ unpack_config(xmlNode * config, pe_working_set_t
* data_set)
return TRUE;
}
+static gint sort_
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:23 PM, wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
>> > I thought whether the configuration files could describe the condition of
>> > the sort.
>>
>> That seems like overkill.
> I don't need me to there either.
> Order of the output becomes unsettled now because it use g_hash_table.
No, it
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Gianluca Cecchi
wrote:
> Hello,
> for example at http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Install
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/i386/epel-release-5-3.noarch.rpm
> has to be changed now into
> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/5/i386/epel-release-5-4.noar
I's always fun replying to our own emails :-)
Solution to point (1): "Fully Sequential MS Promotion"
primitive p_drbd_home ocf:linbit:drbd \
params drbd_resource="home" \
op start interval="0" timeout="60" \
op stop interval="0" timeout="240" \
op monitor interval="20"
primitive p_drbd_so
Hello,
for example at http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Install
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/i386/epel-release-5-3.noarch.rpm
has to be changed now into
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/5/i386/epel-release-5-4.noarch.rpm
(note the 5.3 -> 5.4 too)
see also:
http://lists.fedoraproj
Hi, Jiaju
(2012/02/24 19:38), Jiaju Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 11:10 +0900, Yuusuke Iida wrote:
>> Hi, Jiaju
>>
>> I want to ask some questions about booth.
>>
>> I confirm movement of booth by the following constitution.
>> node1, node2 - siteA(grant ticket)
>> node3, node4 - siteB
>> a
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Kiss Bence wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> did You have the time to look at the bug report? Are there anything missing
> from it?
Just looking now. My queue gets pretty long sometimes.
> An other question. Maybe it better helps for me to understand the problem.
>
> If a
20 matches
Mail list logo
