21.02.2012 02:40, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
> wrote:
>> 20.02.2012 14:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Adrian Fita wrote:
Thanks, I figured it out by now. But the real problem I'm facing is
explained in
>
Hello,
Thanks for the reply.
I have been successfully using Heartbeat as a root user.
But I have a system requirement for which I need to run my different custom
applications (configured using crm) as a non root user.
Can this be done?
Regards
Neha Chatrath
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:05:30 +110
Hi, Jiaju
Thank you for your reply.
(2012/02/20 23:08), Jiaju Zhang wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 17:54 +0900, 李泰勲 wrote:
>> Hi, Jiaju
>>
>> I am trying behavior of revoke Implementation manually.
>>
>> I have questions of revoke.
>>
>> If I revoked in one of grant ticket site, It would be free
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:49 AM, wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for comment.
>
>> I'm getting to this soon, really :-)
>> First it was corosync 2.0 stuff, so that /something/ in fedora-17
>> works, then fixing everything I broke when adding corosync 2.0
>> support.
>
> All right!
>
> I wait f
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> 20.02.2012 14:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Adrian Fita wrote:
>>> Thanks, I figured it out by now. But the real problem I'm facing is
>>> explained in
>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemake
Actually I'm studying this technology. This is only a test. I'm trying to
understand all possible configuration and at the moment I have some
problems to understand the differences among file systems. Now I'm trying
to use ocfs2 and it seems to work well but what is the best alternative?
My big qu
Ok, I understand. Thank you for your explanation.
Le 20/02/2012 15:05, Andreas Kurz a écrit :
Hello,
On 02/18/2012 03:15 PM, Sébastien ROHAUT wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Pacemaker 1.1.6 and corosync 1.4.2 under Fedora Core 16, using
default rpms from repositories.
I'm trying to get a working Pacema
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:16:25PM +0100, Kevin COUSIN wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I try to configure the ocf:heartbeat:conntrackd resource with Pacemaker and
> Corosync on a CentOS 6.2 server. I configure as explained in the man page,
> but it failed with this errors :
>
> Master/Slave Set: ms_C
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 17:54 +0900, 李泰勲 wrote:
> Hi, Jiaju
>
> I am trying behavior of revoke Implementation manually.
>
> I have questions of revoke.
>
> If I revoked in one of grant ticket site, It would be free from grant
> status.
> but the other site runs automatic failover after that!
> Is
Hello,
On 02/18/2012 03:15 PM, Sébastien ROHAUT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Pacemaker 1.1.6 and corosync 1.4.2 under Fedora Core 16, using
> default rpms from repositories.
>
> I'm trying to get a working Pacemaker cluster and I'm testing it by
> creating the "cluster from cratch configuration" f
20.02.2012 14:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Adrian Fita wrote:
>> Thanks, I figured it out by now. But the real problem I'm facing is
>> explained in
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2012-February/013124.html
>> . Please also take a look there. Thi
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Adrian Fita wrote:
> Thanks, I figured it out by now. But the real problem I'm facing is
> explained in
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2012-February/013124.html
> . Please also take a look there. This advisory thing was me trying to
> solve the
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Hugo Deprez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> does anyone have an idea ?
Well I see:
Feb 8 12:59:05 server01 crmd: [19470]: ERROR: process_lrm_event: LRM
operation drbd-nagios:1_monitor_15000 (90) Timed Out (timeout=2ms)
Feb 8 13:00:05 server01 crmd: [19470]: WARN: cib_r
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 at 17:08:44, Thilo Uttendorfer wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 September 2011 at 03:44:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Thilo Uttendorfer
> >
> > > Can somebody explain the error message? This should probably not be
> > > classified as "ERROR", or a
Thanks, I figured it out by now. But the real problem I'm facing is
explained in
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2012-February/013124.html
. Please also take a look there. This advisory thing was me trying to
solve the problem described in that message.
--
Fita Adrian
On Mon, Feb
Hello,
I try to configure the ocf:heartbeat:conntrackd resource with Pacemaker and
Corosync on a CentOS 6.2 server. I configure as explained in the man page, but
it failed with this errors :
Master/Slave Set: ms_CONNTRACKD [p_CONNECTION_TRACKING]
p_CONNECTION_TRACKING:0(ocf::heartbeat
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Devin Reade wrote:
> --On Monday, February 13, 2012 11:21:14 AM +0200 Karlis Kisis
> wrote:
>
>> In most cluster tutorials, for simplicity, iptables is turned off.
>> Funny thing is that iptables is what I want to configure in HA cluster
>> (as redundant firewalls
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Yuusuke Iida
wrote:
> Hi, Yan
>
> OK.
> I performed "pull request" by oneself.
>
> And the change was merged.
> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/3119df0507cc43134d7c458a115c309ce5358fb2
> Thank you for Andrew, an early reaction.
no problem, i'm not
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Adrian Fita wrote:
> Hi. I'm trying something like this: "crm configure order order_id 0:
> nfs_server nfs_mount", but nfs_mount doesn't start after nfs_server,
> instead it starts at pacemaker startup, when nfs_server isn't even
> started.
Right. Did you read w
Hi, Yan
OK.
I performed "pull request" by oneself.
And the change was merged.
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/3119df0507cc43134d7c458a115c309ce5358fb2
Thank you for Andrew, an early reaction.
Thanks,
Yuusuke
(2012/02/20 17:04), Gao,Yan wrote:
Hi Yuusuke,
You may want to fork p
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:39 PM, neha chatrath wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to run heartbeat and pacemaker resources as non-root users.
> When I try to run heartbeat as a "hacluster" user,
That probably wont work. We already try to drop as much privilege as
we can, but some processes need to be ro
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:11 AM, David Coulson wrote:
> On 2/18/12 4:33 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
>>
>> Is setting "meta collocated=false" not working for your group?
>
> Along similar lines, if I have default-resource-stickiness="200" set, what
> is the best way to 'rebalance' resources following a
2012/2/19 Viacheslav Biriukov :
> Hi.
> You don't need cman in your configuration.The best way is use gfs-pcmk and
> dlm-pcmk.
Debatable.
>
>
> 16 февраля 2012 г. 12:30 пользователь emmanuel segura
> написал:
>
>> I don't think so
>>
>> I remember gfs2 && ocfs2 on pacemaker & redhat cluster use
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:37:39AM +0100, fatcha...@gmx.de wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we are using a pacemaker 1.0.5-4.7
1.0.5 is pretty long in the tooth. Please consider something a little
more recent.
> with heartbeat 3.0.0-33.10
Nice documentation, thanx!
On 17/02/12 17:39, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
Hi there!
I wrote documentation about how to build an active-active LDAP cluster
using pacemaker over Debian Squeeze. In the examples I use a 2 nodes
cluster, but I've deployed it in a 3 nodes cluster with success. IP
Hi Yuusuke,
You may want to fork pacemaker repository, commit the fix and send a
pull request, or probably you want me do that for you?
Regards,
Gao,Yan
On 02/20/12 15:21, Yuusuke Iida wrote:
> Hi, Yan
>
> Thank you for comment.
> If a patch does not have a problem, I want a repository to upda
26 matches
Mail list logo
