Re: [Pacemaker] current pacemaker tree and flatiron

2012-01-19 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
20.01.2012 04:27, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > Are you sure? > > > https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/96ab60c6d80a42d8eb9d40a4cea8a08e9d315be5 OK, "current" becomes a little bit abstract when it goes to packaging and testing. Yan was faster then me. Thank you, Vladislav > > On Fri

Re: [Pacemaker] crm_simulate crashes on centos 6.2

2012-01-19 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Besse Mickael wrote: > Hi > > > > I’ve install pacemaker-1.1.6-3 on centos 6.2 to configure a cluster ftp and > I have this error in /var/log/messages when crm_simulate is called : > > > > crm_simulate: [15818]: ERROR: crm_abort: crm_glib_handler: Forked child > 15

Re: [Pacemaker] Proposed new stonith topology syntax

2012-01-19 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Digimer wrote: > On 01/18/2012 01:02 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >>> If I may restate; >>> >>> Out of band management devices (iLO, IPMI, w/e) have two fatal flaws >>> which make them unreliable as sole fence devices; They share their power >>> with the host and t

Re: [Pacemaker] Proposed new stonith topology syntax

2012-01-19 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:58:20PM +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic >> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:19:14PM +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> Does anyone hav

Re: [Pacemaker] current pacemaker tree and flatiron

2012-01-19 Thread Andrew Beekhof
Are you sure? https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/96ab60c6d80a42d8eb9d40a4cea8a08e9d315be5 On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Hi Andrew, all, > > corosync plugin in current github tree at beekhof/pacemaker does not > load in flatiron due to two chunks in

Re: [Pacemaker] How to deal with unix signals in a glib mainloop (was: [Problem] The attrd does not sometimes stop.)

2012-01-19 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Lars, Hi Andrew, I test it now in the environment that the problem reproduces with a patch of Mr. Lars. * The patch of msgfromIPC_ll does not apply it. * The patch of crm_trigger_prepare applies it. The problem does not reappear on the test of several days for the moment. I carry out a test

Re: [Pacemaker] How to deal with unix signals in a glib mainloop (was: [Problem] The attrd does not sometimes stop.)

2012-01-19 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +1100, Angus Salkeld wrote: > On 19/01/12 22:23 +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:13:37AM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > >>On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:52:35AM +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >>> > >>> Ok, done: > >>> > >>> https://github.com

Re: [Pacemaker] How to deal with unix signals in a glib mainloop (was: [Problem] The attrd does not sometimes stop.)

2012-01-19 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 19/01/12 22:23 +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:13:37AM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:52:35AM +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > Ok, done: > > https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/2a6b296 > > If I'm adding voodoo, I at least want the reaso

Re: [Pacemaker] How to deal with unix signals in a glib mainloop (was: [Problem] The attrd does not sometimes stop.)

2012-01-19 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:13:37AM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:52:35AM +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > > > Ok, done: > > > > https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/2a6b296 > > > > If I'm adding voodoo, I at least want the reason well documented so it > > can b

[Pacemaker] Best setup for lots and lots of IPs

2012-01-19 Thread Anton Melser
Hi, I want to set up a very simple NAT device for natting around 2000 internal /24 networks to around 2000 external IPs (1 /24 = 1 public IP). That part works fine (and is *extremely* efficient, I have it on a pretty powerful machine but cpu is 0% with 2gbps going through!) with iproute2 and iptabl

Re: [Pacemaker] Utilization & resource stickiness strange behaviour - sorted resources

2012-01-19 Thread agutxi Agustin
Thank you for your fast reply Andreas. This solved the issue. Tried it in debian squeeze with squeeze backport repositories (Source Package: pacemaker (1.1.6-2~bpo60+1) and behaviour is correct. Best regards 2012/1/19 Andreas Kurz : > Hello, > > On 01/19/2012 01:39 PM, agutxi Agustin wrote: >> Hi

Re: [Pacemaker] crmd - set dc unset dc loop

2012-01-19 Thread Philippe Carbonnier
Hello Andreas, all, many thanks for your help. I have change my configurations, and will take you informed. Best regards, Philippe Le 19/01/2012 14:38, Andreas Kurz a écrit : Hello, On 01/19/2012 12:21 PM, Philippe Carbonnier wrote: Hello Andreas, and others, I'm sorry not having well expl

Re: [Pacemaker] Utilization & resource stickiness strange behaviour - sorted resources

2012-01-19 Thread Andreas Kurz
Hello, On 01/19/2012 01:39 PM, agutxi Agustin wrote: > Hi all, > I am trying to set up a cluster of virtual machine hosts, and while > doing so, I came out with a very strange behaviour (I think it may be > a bug) and I hope you can lend me a hand in debugging this. > For testing the behaviour obs

[Pacemaker] current pacemaker tree and flatiron

2012-01-19 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
Hi Andrew, all, corosync plugin in current github tree at beekhof/pacemaker does not load in flatiron due to two chunks in lib/ais/utils.c and lib/ais/utils.h which reference qb_log_from_external_source(). Best, Vladislav ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pa

Re: [Pacemaker] Does Pacemaker support a 50/50 type high-availability?

2012-01-19 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
> Just to clarify, as I was exhausted last night. I'm looking to setup an > active/active cluster withOUT shared storage. I want to use local > storage only. Is that possible with Pacemaker? If not, do you know of > any software that would help me? Yes. this setup is possible. Just do not configur

Re: [Pacemaker] Does Pacemaker support a 50/50 type high-availability?

2012-01-19 Thread Andrew Martin
Here is a guide for setting up a highly-available NFS server using DRBD as the storage solution (with Pacemaker): http://www.linbit.com/fileadmin/tech-guides/ha-nfs.pdf Thanks, Andrew - Original Message - From: "emmanuel segura" To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" Se

Re: [Pacemaker] Does Pacemaker support a 50/50 type high-availability?

2012-01-19 Thread emmanuel segura
drbd :-) 2012/1/19 > Just to clarify, as I was exhausted last night. I'm looking to setup an > active/active cluster withOUT shared storage. I want to use local storage > only. Is that possible with Pacemaker? If not, do you know of any software > that would help me? > >

[Pacemaker] Does Pacemaker support a 50/50 type high-availability?

2012-01-19 Thread steven
Just to clarify, as I was exhausted last night. I'm looking to setup an active/active cluster withOUT shared storage. I want to use local storage only. Is that possible with Pacemaker? If not, do you know of any software that would help me? ___ Pacem

Re: [Pacemaker] crmd - set dc unset dc loop

2012-01-19 Thread Andreas Kurz
Hello, On 01/19/2012 12:21 PM, Philippe Carbonnier wrote: > Hello Andreas, and others, > > I'm sorry not having well explain my problem (I'm french and don't speak > english fluently...). np .. I'm also not a native speaker ;-) > The loop has arrived after putting ujoss1 (not ujboss2) standy, t

[Pacemaker] Utilization & resource stickiness strange behaviour - sorted resources

2012-01-19 Thread agutxi Agustin
Hi all, I am trying to set up a cluster of virtual machine hosts, and while doing so, I came out with a very strange behaviour (I think it may be a bug) and I hope you can lend me a hand in debugging this. For testing the behaviour observed in my production environment, I set up 2 new simple machin

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] crm shell (configure node) for Heartbeat stack

2012-01-19 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Kazunori-san, On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 05:51:45PM +0900, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > I tested this patch and got the result we wanted. Great! I'll take another look today and push it upstream. Many thanks for testing. Cheers, Dejan > Thank you so much! > > Kazunori INOUE > > >

Re: [Pacemaker] crmd - set dc unset dc loop

2012-01-19 Thread Philippe Carbonnier
Hello Andreas, and others, I'm sorry not having well explain my problem (I'm french and don't speak english fluently...). The loop has arrived after putting ujoss1 (not ujboss2) standy, this is why I put more log for ujboss1 and not ujboss2. I'll try to answer your questions : the network set

Re: [Pacemaker] crmd - set dc unset dc loop

2012-01-19 Thread Andreas Kurz
Hello, On 01/17/2012 04:41 PM, Philippe Carbonnier wrote: > Hello, > > The configuration: > redhat 5.5 64bits > pacemaker-libs-1.0.10-1.4.el5.x86_64 > pacemaker-1.0.10-1.4.el5.x86_64 > corosync-1.2.7-1.1.el5.x86_64 > corosynclib-1.2.7-1.1.el5.x86_64 > > when working : [root@ujboss1 cluster]# crm

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] crm shell (configure node) for Heartbeat stack

2012-01-19 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Dejan, I tested this patch and got the result we wanted. Thank you so much! Kazunori INOUE (12.01.19 08:23), Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi Kazunori-san, Can you please test the attached patch. I'm not sure if it covers all cases, but I believe that it is the right direction. I tested it lig