Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
> Could you send me the PE file related to this log please?
>
> Jan 6 19:22:01 rh57-1 crmd: [3461]: info: do_te_invoke: Processing
> graph 4 (ref=pe_calc-dc-1325845321-26) derived from
> /var/lib/pengine/pe-input-4.bz2
The old file disappeared.
I send log and
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:49 AM, thomas polnik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want setup follow:
> 2 servers with multimaster drbd and ocfs filesystem and mount it.
>
> *system: gentoo, 2.6.39, pacemaker-1.1.5
>
> *Setup pacemaker:
>
> # misc settings
> property no-quorum-policy="ignore"
> property stonith-
16.01.2012 09:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[snip]
>> At the same time, stonith_admin -B succeeds.
>> The main difference I see is st_opt_sync_call in a latter case.
>> Will try to experiment with it.
>
> /Shouldn't/ matter.
It really looks like it matters.
Can't discuss it at more depth though beca
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Christian Parpart wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I am also about to evaluate whether or not Pacemaker+Corosync is the
> way to go for our
> infrastructure.
>
> We are currently having about 45 physical nodes (plus about 60 more
> virtual containers)
> with a statically hist
16.01.2012 09:20, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[snip]
>>> At the same time, stonith_admin -B succeeds.
>>> The main difference I see is st_opt_sync_call in a latter case.
>>> Will try to experiment with it.
>>
>> Ys!!!
>>
>> Now I see following:
>> Dec 19 11:53:34 vd01-a cluster-dlm: [2474]: info:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Reid, Mike wrote:
> I've been doing a lot of testing while I've been learning
> Pacemaker/Heartbeat, DRBD, OCFS2, etc (Nginx, PHP-FPM, Apache…) Below I've
> attached my working CIB, but I worry I am missing something obvious (or
> perhaps going about it incorrectl
This is getting into some pretty specific cman knowledge, you might
find more experts on that at linux-clus...@redhat.com
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Patrick H. wrote:
> So I'm trying to setup a cluster with a secondary communication ring in case
> the first ring fails. The cluster operates f
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:37 PM, wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for comment.
>
>> But it should have a subsequent stop action which would set it back to
>> being inactive.
>> Did that not happen in this case?
>
> Yes.
Could you send me the PE file related to this log please?
Jan 6 19:22:01
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> 19.12.2011 14:39, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>> 09.12.2011 08:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
>>> wrote:
09.12.2011 03:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:32 AM
Sorry for not getting to this earlier...
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> 09.12.2011 08:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
>> wrote:
>>> 09.12.2011 03:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Vladisl
Hi Andrew,
Hi Lars,
> Its in my private tree so far:
> https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/bfbb73c
>
> It will make its way to clusterlabs when I merge next.
All right!
Many Thanks!
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Mon, 2012/1/16, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:48 AM,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Qiu Zhigang wrote:
> Hi, All
>
>
>
> I want to use SBD device as a stonith device in RHCS, but how could I
> configure sbd resource agent?
I don't think you can, it doesn't ship at part of RHCS at this stage.
No idea if that will change.
You'd have to build and in
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Arnold Krille wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2012 20:08:50 Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:59:13AM +, shashi wrote:
>> > So we have two probable options:
>> > 1. An work around to achieve this tri-state efficiently without changing
>> > p
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Lars Ellenberg
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 04:43:51PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>> Hi Lars,
>>
>> I attach strace file when a problem reappeared at the end of last year.
>> I used glue which applied your patch for confirmation.
>>
>> It is the f
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:48 AM, wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Hi Lars,
>
>> >> If you want it to be between [0, max-1],
>> >> obviously that should be
>> >> while(max > 0 && sequence >= max) {
>> >> sequence -= max;
>> >> }
>
> The rotation was carried out definitely fro
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> By "Nuclear", I meant nothing at all from Pacemaker.
>
> Which is not what it does.
The daemons. The RAs are not "from Pacemaker".
This is why I wrote in my first reply:
"/some/
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> By "Nuclear", I meant nothing at all from Pacemaker.
Which is not what it does.
> If thats what you want, there's a far easier way to achieve this and
> keep usable logs around for debugging, set facility to none and add a
> logfile.
No
Hi Andrew,
Hi Lars,
> >> If you want it to be between [0, max-1],
> >> obviously that should be
> >> while(max > 0 && sequence >= max) {
> >> sequence -= max;
> >> }
The rotation was carried out definitely from 0 to max-1.
> >> Though I wonder why not simply:
> >
Hi Lars,
Thank you for comments and suggestion.
> > poll([{fd=7, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}, {fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}, {fd=5,
> > events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 3, -1
>
> Note the -1 (infinity timeout!)
>
> So even though the trigger was (presumably) set,
> and the ->prepare() should have returned
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:56 AM, wrote:
> Hi Lars,
> Hi Andrew,
>
>> If you want it to be between [0, max-1],
>> obviously that should be
>> while(max > 0 && sequence >= max) {
>> sequence -= max;
>> }
>
> Thanks!!I try it.
>
>> Though I wonder why not simply:
>>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
Florian Haas (2):
extra: add rsyslog configuration snipp
Hi Lars,
Hi Andrew,
> If you want it to be between [0, max-1],
> obviously that should be
> while(max > 0 && sequence >= max) {
> sequence -= max;
> }
Thanks!!I try it.
> Though I wonder why not simply:
> if (max == 0)
> return;
> if (sequence > ma
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
>>> Florian Haas (2):
>>> extra: add rsyslog configuration snippet
>>> extra: add logrotate configuration snippet
>>>
>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
>> Florian Haas (2):
>> extra: add rsyslog configuration snippet
>> extra: add logrotate configuration snippet
>>
>> configure.ac | 4 +++
>> extra/Makef
24 matches
Mail list logo
