> >
> > That thread goes around in circles and completely contradicts what
I'm
> > seeing. What I'm seeing is that unmanaged resources are never
monitored.
>
> would be strange and how do you verify this? A look at your config may
also
> help to shed some light on this ...
>
The relevant portion
On 11/29/2011 07:14 PM, Hans Lammerts wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>
>
> I have something strange I would like the community to give it’s opinion
> on. I can’t figure out
>
> what is going wrong.
>
>
>
> I have a 2 node cluster (named cl1 and cl2). On this cluster I’m running
> MySQL, Apache, and
On 11/29/2011 11:37 PM, James Harper wrote:
>>
>> On 11/29/2011 11:30 AM, James Harper wrote:
>>> Is pacemaker expected to monitor stopped and/or unmanaged resources?
>>> I'm guessing not because that's what I've observed but I can't find
>>> the behaviour documented anywhere so maybe there is a co
>
> On 11/29/2011 11:30 AM, James Harper wrote:
> > Is pacemaker expected to monitor stopped and/or unmanaged resources?
> > I'm guessing not because that's what I've observed but I can't find
> > the behaviour documented anywhere so maybe there is a config option
I
> > can tweak?
>
> There was a
On 11/29/2011 05:22 PM, James Horner wrote:
> Hi There
>
> I am trying to setup a cluster with 2 resource groups that depends on a
> service that only needs to be active once. Both Resource Groups depend
> on this service and I don't want it to be stopped when one moves away
> but I do want it sto
Hi there,
I have something strange I would like the community to give it’s opinion on. I
can’t figure out
what is going wrong.
I have a 2 node cluster (named cl1 and cl2). On this cluster I’m running MySQL,
Apache, and
Zarafa. Both clusters run CentOS 6.
I have downloaded all latest so
Hi There
I am trying to setup a cluster with 2 resource groups that depends on a
service that only needs to be active once. Both Resource Groups depend on
this service and I don't want it to be stopped when one moves away but I do
want it stopped when both resource groups move away.
The specifics
On 11/29/2011 11:30 AM, James Harper wrote:
> Is pacemaker expected to monitor stopped and/or unmanaged resources? I'm
> guessing not because that's what I've observed but I can't find the
> behaviour documented anywhere so maybe there is a config option I can
> tweak?
There was a thread on this t
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Roman Moskvitin wrote:
> Hello.
> I need help with pacemaker 1.1.6 and "priority".
> I get cloned resource "qm", running on all nodes.
> And need to run another resource, "moderate" with one condition. On a
> node, that runs "moderate" resource, resource "qm" must
Hello.
I need help with pacemaker 1.1.6 and "priority".
I get cloned resource "qm", running on all nodes.
And need to run another resource, "moderate" with one condition. On a
node, that runs "moderate" resource, resource "qm" must be stopped. By
doc i can simple add "meta priority=5" to the resour
Is pacemaker expected to monitor stopped and/or unmanaged resources? I'm
guessing not because that's what I've observed but I can't find the
behaviour documented anywhere so maybe there is a config option I can
tweak?
Thanks
James
___
Pacemaker mailin
11 matches
Mail list logo
