Re: [Pacemaker] Adding VIP support for the MySQL RA

Because that's not enough, if a slave lags behind too much, I want to remove the vip but not stop the slave. On 11-11-11 06:12 PM, Michael Marrotte wrote: Why don't you simply colocate VIP's with the master/slave roles? On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Yves Trudeau

Re: [Pacemaker] Pure-FTPd resource script is wrong (at least on ubuntu and probably debian)

For your info in mysql RA script there is the following (mysql_start function): if [ ! -d $pid_dir ] ; then ocf_log info "Creating PID dir: $pid_dir" mkdir -p $pid_dir chown $OCF_RESKEY_user:$OCF_RESKEY_group $pid_dir fi no problem if you want to keep the pure-ftpd ra script as is,

Re: [Pacemaker] Adding VIP support for the MySQL RA

Why don't you simply colocate VIP's with the master/slave roles? On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Yves Trudeau wrote: > Hi, > I created a fork of the resource-agents and modified the mysql RA to > supports VIP. The support for read/write VIPs is something that currently > limits the use of pac

[Pacemaker] Adding VIP support for the MySQL RA

Hi, I created a fork of the resource-agents and modified the mysql RA to supports VIP. The support for read/write VIPs is something that currently limits the use of pacemaker to manage mysql replication. I ran some basic tests on the modified agent and it seems behaving sanely so far but

Re: [Pacemaker] [Problem]A monitor of Master stops when crm command repeat the movement of the resource.

Hi Dejan, Thank you for comment. This correction seems to be necessary for the cancellation of the monitor of the Master/Slave resource. This correction creates right states of Master/Slave. I tested it. And the correction solved a problem. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Sat, 2011/11/12,

Re: [Pacemaker] [Problem]A monitor of Master stops when crm command repeat the movement of the resource.

Hi Hideo-san, On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:03:28PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi All, > > In the first place lrmd does not return the result of the cancellation > request that made pending. > > However, a result of the cancellation is necessary for crmd. > > Will not the followin

Re: [Pacemaker] Live migration with order constraints

Hi, > Yes, and there is a simple reason for that: it's much faster than > vzmigrate. The checkpoint and restore can be completed in a matter of > seconds, and the incurred downtime is minimal. In HA configurations, > uptime is something people care about a lot, so it made sense to > implement it t

Re: [Pacemaker] Pure-FTPd resource script is wrong (at least on ubuntu and probably debian)

hi! as i'm quote familiar with the pure-ftpd script, i'm stepping into this conversation. On 2011-11-10 18:40, Mailing List SVR wrote: 1) I have this primitive: primitive ftp_service ocf:heartbeat:Pure-FTPd \ params script="/usr/sbin/pure-ftpd-wrapper" daemon_type="postgresql" pidfile="/var/ru

Re: [Pacemaker] Live migration with order constraints

On 2011-11-11 01:23, Dmitry Golubev wrote: >> ManageVE has migration support using chkpt/restore since resource-agents >> version 1.0.4. but if I understand the OpenVZ migration concept >> correct ... please someone correct me if I'm wrong! ... there is no need >> for a shared storage. >> >> T