Hi Andrew,
> Ok, I've recreated as http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5001
All right.
Thanks!.
Hideo Yamauchi.
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:27 PM, wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Thank you for comment.
> >
> >> Which still appears to be down :-(
> >> Do you have the tarball still?
>
Ok, I've recreated as http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5001
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:27 PM, wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for comment.
>
>> Which still appears to be down :-(
>> Do you have the tarball still?
>
> I may not be the completely same as the contents which I attached f
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Proskurin Kirill
wrote:
> On 10/07/2011 02:13 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Proskurin Kirill
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/05/2011 04:19 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Proskurin Kirill
wrote
This part:
+} else if (hash_entry->timer_id != 0) {
+crm_debug_2("Update already scheduled");
+return;
is definitely wrong. Subsequent changes to an attribute value are
intended to reset the timer.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Rainer Weikusat
wrote:
> # HG changeset pat
Hi, Lars, everybody
(2011/10/11 17:24), Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> DRBD has fencing policies (fencing resource-and-stonith, for example),
> which, if configured, cause it to call fencing handlers (handler { fence-peer
> })
> when appropriate.
>
> There are various fence-peer handlers.
> One i
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:34 PM, raki wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> Hi Andrew
> We had installed Heartbeat/Pacemaker on two Unix(Centos 5.0.2 Machines)
> The RPM's we had used for installing Heartbeat ad Pacemaker are
> heartbeat-3.0.3-2.3.el5.i386.rpm
> pacemaker-1.0.9.1-1.15.el5.i386.rpm
> Please find t
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:05 AM, King, Christopher
wrote:
> Possible bug with mandatory ordering involving stateful (i.e. master-slave)
> resources
>
>
>
> I have a 2-node cluster (we are running the SLES 11 HA extension, so the
> pacemaker version is 1.1.2) in which a master-slave resource is depe
I'd be checking your apache logs, my guess is that it doesn't like the config.
Or see where/why the Apache RA could be returning 1.
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Miltiadis Koutsokeras
wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I have gathered all interesting config and log files to a single archive.
> See the atta
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Proskurin Kirill
wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> corosync-1.4.1
> pacemaker-1.1.5
> pacemaker runs with "ver: 1"
>
> I run again on monitoring fail and still don`t know why it happends.
> Details are here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org/msg09986
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Viacheslav Biriukov
wrote:
> Hi all.
> Now in the pacemaker documentation you propose to use CMAN instead of the
> pacemaker crm for the gfs2
> (http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/ch08s02.html).
No, cman instead of Pacem
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I have compiled the cluster stack from source and now trying to setup
> ocfs2 however, I noticed that I do not have
> dlm_controld.pcmk set-up. I was wondering if someone could shed some
> light not this please? ocfs2, o2cb,
Hello Everyone,
I have compiled the cluster stack from source and now trying to setup
ocfs2 however, I noticed that I do not have
dlm_controld.pcmk set-up. I was wondering if someone could shed some
light not this please? ocfs2, o2cb, dlm
configsys etc.. are all working manually.
Thanks in Advanc
Hi Yves,
this is really a question for the Pacemaker list, so I'm cross-posting
there. Please follow up on that list.
On 2011-10-11 18:33, Yves Trudeau wrote:
> Hi,
> I started to have issues with crm_master with Pacemaker 1.0.11. I
> think I traced it down to the following problem. I know
I don't have too much of experience with pacemaker in Devian. I'd also
suggest getting the latest version of pgsql RA from git, though if your
basic package is too old there could be conflicts.
On Oct 11, 2011 9:11 AM, "Amar Prasovic" wrote:
>
> >What version of resource-agents package do you us
On 2011-10-11 17:10, Amar Prasovic wrote:
>
> >What version of resource-agents package do you use? Old version of
> pgsql
> >depended on fuser tool installed, otherway it could fail with that
> error
> >code.
>
>
> Hello Serge,
>
> thank you for your answer.
>
> I don't ha
> >What version of resource-agents package do you use? Old version of pgsql
> >depended on fuser tool installed, otherway it could fail with that error
> >code.
>
Hello Serge,
thank you for your answer.
I don't have any resource-agents installed. The system is Debian Squeeze
6.0.3 and it automa
On 2011-10-11 16:10, Amar Prasovic wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I tried to configure postgres RA and I ran into some problems.
>
> [...]
>
> in crm_mon
> Online: [ webnode02 webnode01 ]
>
> Master/Slave Set: drbd_cluster
> Masters: [ webnode01 ]
> Slaves: [ webnode02 ]
> Resource Gro
What version of resource-agents package do you use? Old version of pgsql
depended on fuser tool installed, otherway it could fail with that error
code.
On Oct 11, 2011 8:12 AM, "Amar Prasovic" wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I tried to configure postgres RA and I ran into some problems.
>
> I conf
Hello everyone,
I tried to configure postgres RA and I ran into some problems.
I configured several resources in my cluster config where pgsql was set to
run last, after DRBD, Filesystem, IPAddr2 and nginx.
Here is how it looks like in crm configure:
crm(live)configure# show
node webnode01 \
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:09:52AM +0900, H.Nakai wrote:
> Hi, Andreas, Lars, and everybody
>
> I will try newer version.
>
> But, I want below.
DRBD has fencing policies (fencing resource-and-stonith, for example),
which, if configured, cause it to call fencing handlers (handler { fence-peer
.
On 10/11/11 04:35, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
On 2011-10-08 15:55, Bart Coninckx wrote:
On 10/08/11 00:25, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:21:08PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
On 10/06/11 22:03, Florian Haas wrote:
On 2011-10-0
21 matches
Mail list logo