On 10/03/2011 05:32 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
corosync-1.4.1
pacemaker-1.1.5
pacemaker runs with "ver: 1"
2)
This one is scary.
I twice run on situation then pacemaker thinks what resource is started but
it is not.
RA is misbehaving. Pacemaker will only consider a resource running if
the RA
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> On 10/02/2011 11:04 PM, Rasto Levrinc wrote:
>>
>> Good news everyone!
>>
>> I am happy to announce LCMC, Linux Cluster Management Console. LCMC is a
>> Java GUI application that configures, manages and visualizes Linux
>> clusters in
03.10.2011 04:41, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[...]
If pacemaker fully finish processing of one membership change - elect
new DC on a quorate partition, and do not try to take over dc role (or
release it) on a non-quorate partition if quorate one exists, that
problem could be gone.
>>
On 10/02/2011 11:04 PM, Rasto Levrinc wrote:
Good news everyone!
I am happy to announce LCMC, Linux Cluster Management Console. LCMC is a
Java GUI application that configures, manages and visualizes Linux clusters in a
way that is not possible to be web-based. Specifically it manages clusters
th
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Gerald Vogt wrote:
> On 02.10.11 03:18, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
> > 1. You expect rndc and host to be in $PATH. At the same time the path
> to
> > named can be configured. I think consequently, the same should apply
> to
> > rndc and host as they are bi
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> 27.09.2011 10:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
>> wrote:
>>> 27.09.2011 08:59, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> [snip]
> I agree with Jiaju
> (https://lists.linux-foundation.org/p
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
>> Try no-quorum-policy=freeze instead.
>
> I considered this option, but that puts us into a situation where if
> node X and Y fail, then resources from them won't be started up on Z.
> I would like to (if possible) avoid that -- I want one node
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Proskurin Kirill
wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> corosync-1.4.1
> pacemaker-1.1.5
> pacemaker runs with "ver: 1"
>
> I run on some problems this week. I not sure if I need to make 3 separate
> letters, sorry if so.
I believe that should be fixed in 1.1.6
There was some pr
Why would you want to do this?
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Med Hmici wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to find out a recipe to setup a node part of clusters. However, I
> only want the node to be active in one cluster at a time. I'd like to do
> this all programatically, that is with without y
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 09/27/2011 07:58 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> it turns out that there was zero feedback about people wanting to
>> present, only some about travel budget being too tight to come. So we
>> had some discussions about whether to c
Good news everyone!
I am happy to announce LCMC, Linux Cluster Management Console. LCMC is a
Java GUI application that configures, manages and visualizes Linux clusters in a
way that is not possible to be web-based. Specifically it manages clusters
that use one or more of these components: Pacemak
you can create a colocation rule
-Mensaje original-
De: Tomasz Chmielewski
Para: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Enviado: dom, 02 oct 2011, 09:07:12 GMT+00:00
Asunto: [Pacemaker] 4 servers; different resources on different servers?
I want to build a cluster of 4 servers (servers A, B, C,
Hi Mark,
Both Apache services were installed and stopped before starting the
corosync service.
I have researched the resource agents sources and I'm getting suspicious
that in Debian
preconfigured Apache and Pacemaker installation, there may be an issue
with ocf:heartbeat:apache
agent. I will
Hi Nick,
Here is the output of the "crm configure show":
node node-0
node node-1
primitive Apache2 ocf:heartbeat:apache \
params configfile="/etc/apache2/apache2.conf" \
op monitor interval="1min" \
meta target-role="Started"
primitive ClusterIP ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 \
params ip=
Hello Everyone,
We are just adopting the pacemaker stack to offer our voip and db
services to our clients.
My direct and general question is, if we install the HA stack with a
virtualization software
(VMWare, XEN, VirtualBox etc..) on bare steel, do we have in theory
cloud computing?
I understand
I want to build a cluster of 4 servers (servers A, B, C, D), with
different resources on them (mysql, webserver):
webservers: A B C D
mysql: A B
Is there a way to make Pacemaker/heartbeat to let assign MySQL IP *only*
to servers A or B? Webserver IPs should be assigned to all servers (A,
B
On 02.10.11 03:18, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
> 1. You expect rndc and host to be in $PATH. At the same time the path to
> named can be configured. I think consequently, the same should apply to
> rndc and host as they are bind utils.
>
> On our CentOS servers we run the latest version
17 matches
Mail list logo
