Re: [Pacemaker] Concurrent runs of 'crm configure primitive' interfering

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On 11-09-16 11:14 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:41:42PM +0100, John Spray wrote: >> >>>  * Is there another way of adding resources which would be safe when >>> run concurrently? >> >> cibadmin. > > But doesn'

Re: [Pacemaker] resource moving unnecessarily due to ping race condition

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Brad Johnson wrote: > The patch alone does not give an advantage to the active node. But remember > I said we are using an fping resource agent we wrote that varies the > dampening based on which node it is running on and whether the score is > rising or falling.

Re: [Pacemaker] Can't failover Master/Slave with group(primitive x3) setting

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Junko IKEDA wrote: > Hi, > >> Which version did you check? > > Pacemaker 1.0.11. I meant of 1.1 since you said: "Pacemaker 1.1 shows the same behavior." > >> The latest from git seems to work fine: >> >> Current cluster status: >> Online: [ bl460g1n13 bl460g1n

Re: [Pacemaker] When a disk becomes to the full, memory leak happens in pengine of the DC.

Hi, Andrew Thank you for a reply. I understood that it was not a problem of pacemaker. I spend it for the capacity of the disk carefully. Thanks, Yuusuke (2011/09/26 16:20), Andrew Beekhof wrote: This looks like a libbz2 bug to me. We're cleaning up the string we're writing out and calling bzWr

[Pacemaker] Configuring Pacemaker & DRBD

I'm trying to configure Pacemaker to manage a drbd resource on a two-node RHEL 6 cluster by the following guide: http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/DRBD_HowTo_1.0 drbd is 8.04 and works outside of Pacemaker. My configuration is very simple: primitive convirt_drbd ocf:linbit:drbd \ params

Re: [Pacemaker] Reloading a resource after a failover

Put bind itself under pacemaker control. You can use LSB RA or OCF RA that I recently created. On Sep 28, 2011 10:46 AM, "Max Williams" wrote: > Hi, > I have a pair of clustered DNS servers with a virtual IP (VIP) configured. The problem is that when the VIP fails over, named on the new host of t

Re: [Pacemaker] Reloading a resource after a failover

Max Williams writes: > I have a pair of clustered DNS servers with a virtual IP (VIP) > configured. The problem is that when the VIP fails over, named on > the new host of the VIP will not listen on port 53/UDP of the VIP > until it is reloaded (I think this is because this daemon uses UDP, > not

Re: [Pacemaker] Reloading a resource after a failover

Max Williams wrote: Hi, I have a pair of clustered DNS servers with a virtual IP (VIP) configured. The problem is that when the VIP fails over, named on the new host of the VIP will not listen on port 53/UDP of the VIP until it is reloaded (I think this is because this daemon uses UDP, not TCP

[Pacemaker] Reloading a resource after a failover

Hi, I have a pair of clustered DNS servers with a virtual IP (VIP) configured. The problem is that when the VIP fails over, named on the new host of the VIP will not listen on port 53/UDP of the VIP until it is reloaded (I think this is because this daemon uses UDP, not TCP). So I'd like to be

Re: [Pacemaker] Concurrent runs of 'crm configure primitive' interfering

On 11-09-28 10:20 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, Hi, > I'm really not sure. Need to investigate this area more. Well, I am experimenting with cibadmin. It's certainly not as nice and shiny as crm shell though. :-) > cibadmin talks to the cib (the process) and cib should allow > only one w

Re: [Pacemaker] [Partially SOLVED] pacemaker/dlm problems

Hi Andrew, >> All the more reason to start using the stonith api directly. >> I was playing around list night with the dlm_controld.pcmk code: >> >> https://github.com/beekhof/dlm/commit/9f890a36f6844c2a0567aea0a0e29cc47b01b787 > > Doesn't seem to apply to 3.0.17, so I rebased that commit aga

Re: [Pacemaker] Concurrent runs of 'crm configure primitive' interfering

Hi, On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 09:12:57AM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On 11-09-16 11:14 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:41:42PM +0100, John Spray wrote: > > > >> * Is there another way of adding resources which would be safe when > >> run concurrently? > > > > ciba

Re: [Pacemaker] Concurrent runs of 'crm configure primitive' interfering

On 11-09-16 11:14 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:41:42PM +0100, John Spray wrote: > >> * Is there another way of adding resources which would be safe when >> run concurrently? > > cibadmin. But doesn't crm use cibadmin itself and if so, shouldn't whatever benefits of

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

Hi, 27.09.2011 10:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote: [snip] > All the more reason to start using the stonith api directly. > I was playing around list night with the dlm_controld.pcmk code: > > https://github.com/beekhof/dlm/commit/9f890a36f6844c2a0567aea0a0e29cc47b01b787 Doesn't seem to apply to 3.0.

[Pacemaker] DMC 0.9.9 - Pacemaker/Storage GUI

Hi, This is the next DMC release 0.9.9. DMC is Pacemaker, Cluster Virtual Manager and Storage/DRBD/LVM GUI. Focus of this release was on bug fixes and some visual issues. You will now find a skip-initial-full-sync checkbox in the DRBD wizard, that, well, skips the initial full sync. You can get

[Pacemaker] Stonith / Fencing

Hi there, I'm working on stonith on my test cluster. It has, to me, a strange behaviour: when the condition to fence the other node happens, is it normal that both primary/secondary node fences the other one? I thought that the primary should fence the secondary, as it is the master at drbd le