I have 6 servers with three sets of 2 failover pairs. So 2 servers for one
pair, 2 servers for another pair etc. I am trying to configure this under
one pacemaker instance.
I changed from using Resource groups because the resources are not dependent
on each other, just located together.
I have 4
> >> 1) During stop operation libvirt occasionally returns an error because
> >> the state cannot be determined just the moment the machine is shut
> >> down. This patch makes the RA try to get the state again one time. If
> >> the machine is down then everything is OK.
> >>
> >> 2) The next probl
Le lundi 08 août 2011 12:25:25, Albéric de Pertat a écrit :
> Le lundi 08 août 2011 12:01:06, Andreas Kurz a écrit :
> > On 2011-08-05 15:57, Albéric de Pertat wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm beginning to use pacemaker and I have come across the following
> > > problem :
> > >
> > >
> >
1) During stop operation libvirt occasionally returns an error because the
state cannot be determined just the moment the machine is shut down. This
patch makes the RA try to get the state again one time. If the machine is
down then everything is OK.
2) The next problem is that a graceful shutd
04.08.2011 06:08, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
> wrote:
>> 01.08.2011 02:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Hmm. Interesting. I will
Le lundi 08 août 2011 12:01:06, Andreas Kurz a écrit :
> On 2011-08-05 15:57, Albéric de Pertat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I'm beginning to use pacemaker and I have come across the following
> > problem :
> >
> >
> > I have two nodes with ips 10.0.9.11/24 and 10.0.9.12/24 routed via
> > 10.0.9.
On 2011-08-05 15:57, Albéric de Pertat wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm beginning to use pacemaker and I have come across the following
> problem :
>
>
> I have two nodes with ips 10.0.9.11/24 and 10.0.9.12/24 routed via
> 10.0.9.254. I have declared an IPaddr resource for 10.0.10.10/24. So far
> so good
Hi Steven,
On 07.08.2011, at 18:44, Steven Dake wrote:
> If a ring is marked faulty, it is no longer operational and there is no
> longer a redundant network.
Ok, but compared to a seemingly operational backup ring that appearantly
ultimately causes the cluster nodes to shoot each other for no
On Friday 05 August 2011 at 15:57 (CET), Albéric de Pertat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm beginning to use pacemaker and I have come across the
> following problem :
>
> I have two nodes with ips 10.0.9.11/24 and 10.0.9.12/24 routed
> via 10.0.9.254. I have declared an IPaddr resource for
> 10.0.10.10/24.
Hi Devin and thanks for your quick reply.
Le vendredi 05 août 2011 22:54:32, Devin Reade a écrit :
> --On Friday, August 05, 2011 03:57:53 PM +0200 Albéric de Pertat
>
> wrote:
> > I have two nodes with ips 10.0.9.11/24 and 10.0.9.12/24 routed
> > via 10.0.9.254. I have declared an IPaddr resour
10 matches
Mail list logo