I'm sorry.
Because a code for debugging was left, I deleted it.
I attach a new thing.
(2011/07/12 20:40), Yuusuke IIDA wrote:
Hi, Yan
I report a new problem of "placement-strategy".
I set colocation in resource grpPostgreSQLDB1 which provided service and
"clnPingd" resource.
grpPostgreSQLDB
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 08:30:21AM +0200, Rasto Levrinc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the next DRBD:MC release 0.9.4. DRBD:MC is DRBD, Pacemaker and
> Cluster Virtual Manager GUI.
Well, one problem with that release long time ago was that
setting allow-two-primaries in DRBD config stopped working. It
On 2011-07-12T15:54:38, Nikita Michalko wrote:
> rc=1. lrmd/crmd shows immediately after failed start "unknown
> error" and attrd sets the fail-count for this resource
> (ubis_alarmmelder_1) to INFINITY.
That's the default behaviour "start-failure-is-fatal" is the option
you're looking for, i
Hi all!
I know there was already similar thread in the past on this ML, but I
found nothing to solve my problem.
Just short problem description:
Simple 2 nodes-cluster with 12 LSB resources in 2 groups (and 2 extra
IPMI's) -see configuration attached. All is working well until the start
of th
On 12/07/11 13:48, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 12/07/11 13:02, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> 2011/7/12 Pádraig Brady :
>>> So -Wnounused-but-set-variable will disable that particular warning.
>>
>> Perfect. Added that to configure.
>
> -Wno-unused-but-set-variable even
>
> Red Hat 4.5.1-4 had -Wunused-b
On 12/07/11 13:02, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> 2011/7/12 Pádraig Brady :
>> So -Wnounused-but-set-variable will disable that particular warning.
>
> Perfect. Added that to configure.
-Wno-unused-but-set-variable even
Red Hat 4.5.1-4 had -Wunused-but-set-variable but it's
auto enabled with -Wall sinc
2011/7/12 Pádraig Brady :
> On 12/07/11 02:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> 2011/7/1 Pádraig Brady :
>>> On 01/07/11 07:34, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
2011/6/28 Pádraig Brady :
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Pádraig Brady
> # Date 1309255312 -3600
> # Node ID 7948a86a7e9510db13baa318f
On 2011-07-12T10:37:47, Sebastian Kaps wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
> Our goal is to create an Active/Standby MySQL cluster with the
> databases being
> on the XFS filesystem. The OCFS2 FS is supposed to store data that
> is created by
> scripts that access the MySQL server database.
That sounds perfec
On 12/07/11 02:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> 2011/7/1 Pádraig Brady :
>> On 01/07/11 07:34, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> 2011/6/28 Pádraig Brady :
# HG changeset patch
# User Pádraig Brady
# Date 1309255312 -3600
# Node ID 7948a86a7e9510db13baa318fe64e9015fdbbd72
# Parent 7557
Hi!
We have set up a 2-node Pacemaker cluster using SLES 11 SP1 +
HA-Extension.
Each machine has two DRBD resources, on is called 'mysql' and the other
'wwwdata'.
The mysql resource has an XFS filesystem; wwwdata is using an OCFS2 1.4
FS.
Our goal is to create an Active/Standby MySQL cluster w
I don't believe there is any need for additional RPMs. Pacemaker
should already be in CentOS6
For example we're running Redhat on an academic licence and don't have a
subscription for the HA channel. It would be very welcome to have RPM's
from Clusterlabs.
Bye,
Marco.
11 matches
Mail list logo