Re: [Pacemaker] [Openais] question for the technical support

2011-06-09 Thread Tim Serong
(this is more appropriate to the pacemaker list than openais) On 09/06/11 22:16, Андрей Гребенников wrote: Greetings! I'd like you to help me with the problem dealing with the Pacemaker being set up in The Suse Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP1. I'm going through the article http://www.novell.com/

[Pacemaker] primary role not being taken by secondary on hard shutdown of the original primary

2011-06-09 Thread Shravan Mishra
Hi guys, I'm facing weird problem, I'm not sure if anyone else has seen this. Basically I have a pair and when I do a hard shutdown like ---"ipmitool chassis power off" --- of primary then secondary is just sitting as it is and drbd is not becoming master on that box. Some info about my environm

Re: [Pacemaker] RHEL 6.0 STONITH configuration

2011-06-09 Thread Pawel Warowny
Dnia Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:43:31 -0400 Digimer napisał(a): Hi > The person who can answer this is Andrew Beekhof, but he is currently > in the middle of a move. If you don't get an answer in a couple of > days, ask again in case this gets lost in the mountain of email he'll > no doubt have waiting

Re: [Pacemaker] RHEL 6.0 STONITH configuration

2011-06-09 Thread Pawel Warowny
Dnia Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:34:25 + Max Williams napisał(a): Hi > I don't have any ILOs but I do use RHEL6 with Dell DRACs. Perhaps > something like this: > > primitive stonith-node1 stonith:fence_ilo I have only one running node now, but I've crated configuration based on your post and it lo

[Pacemaker] (Linux-HA)Remove rsc_defaults from command line crm configure

2011-06-09 Thread Warrior
Hi, I have to create a script to remove a value of rsc_defaults, firts of all i need to know how to remove from command line with crm commands, i know how to put the value with crm configure, like crm(live)configure# rsc_defaults resource-stickiness="INFINITY" this line works fine, but i need the r

Re: [Pacemaker] RHEL 6.0 STONITH configuration

2011-06-09 Thread Digimer
On 06/09/2011 09:11 AM, Pawel Warowny wrote: Hi I've just moved my cluster from Debian Squeeze to RedHat 6.0. Everything (well almost :)) went fluently beside STONITH configuration. My hardware are HP DL370 G6 servers with iLO interface. On Debian I had stonith configured this way: primitive

Re: [Pacemaker] 3rd node just for quorum

2011-06-09 Thread Klaus Darilion
Am 09.06.2011 01:05, schrieb Anton Altaparmakov: > Hi Klaus, > > On 8 Jun 2011, at 22:21, Klaus Darilion wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Currently I have a 2 node cluster and I want to add a 3rd node to use >> quorum to avoid split brain. >> >> The service (DRBD+DB) should only run either on node1 or node2.

Re: [Pacemaker] RHEL 6.0 STONITH configuration

2011-06-09 Thread Max Williams
I don't have any ILOs but I do use RHEL6 with Dell DRACs. Perhaps something like this: primitive stonith-node1 stonith:fence_ilo \ params ipaddr=" ilo1" action="reboot" login="some_login " passwd="some_pass " pcmk_host_list=" node1" pcmk_host_check="static-list" \ meta target-ro

[Pacemaker] RHEL 6.0 STONITH configuration

2011-06-09 Thread Pawel Warowny
Hi I've just moved my cluster from Debian Squeeze to RedHat 6.0. Everything (well almost :)) went fluently beside STONITH configuration. My hardware are HP DL370 G6 servers with iLO interface. On Debian I had stonith configured this way: primitive stonith-node1 stonith:external/riloe \ params h

Re: [Pacemaker] 3rd node just for quorum

2011-06-09 Thread ruslan usifov
You need follow location constraint: location ms_drbd_web_on_storage0_or_storage1 ms_drbd_web \ rule -inf: \#uname ne storage0 and \#uname ne storage1 2011/6/9 Jelle de Jong > On 08-06-11 23:21, Klaus Darilion wrote: > > The service (DRBD+DB) should only run either on node1 or node2. N

Re: [Pacemaker] Nodes with different pacemaker version

2011-06-09 Thread Pawel Warowny
Dnia Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:39:30 +0200 Dejan Muhamedagic napisał(a): Hi > corosync obiously left (crashed?). Any core dumps in > /var/lib/corosync? Yes, and no core dumps in /var/lib/corosync > This should work. I guess that you ran into a bug. There were some other problems with compatibility,

Re: [Pacemaker] 3rd node just for quorum

2011-06-09 Thread Jelle de Jong
On 08-06-11 23:21, Klaus Darilion wrote: > The service (DRBD+DB) should only run either on node1 or node2. Node3 > can not provide the service - it should just help the other nodes to > find out if their network is broken or the other node's network is broken. I spent several days trying to get a