As it is right now, pacemaker seems to take a long time (in computer
terms) to fail over resources from one node to the other. Right now, I
have 477 IPaddr2 resources evenly distributed among 2 nodes. When I put
one node in standby, it takes approximately 5 minutes to move the half
of those fro
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 03:53:29PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Lars Ellenberg
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:24:35AM +0100, patrik.rappo...@knapp.com wrote:
> >> we already made changes to the interval and timeout ( >> id="pingd-op-monitor-30s" interval
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Lars Ellenberg
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:24:35AM +0100, patrik.rappo...@knapp.com wrote:
>> we already made changes to the interval and timeout (> id="pingd-op-monitor-30s" interval="30s" name="monitor" timeout="10s"/>).
>>
>> how big should dampen be set
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:18:36PM -0700, Devin Reade wrote:
> Johannes Freygner wrote:
>
> > *) Yes, and I found the wrong setting:
>
> Excellent.
>
> > But if I pull the power cable without a regular shutting down,
> > the powerless node gets status "UNCLEAN (offline)" and the
> > resou
hy,
thx i configured these values now. i hope that we won't face this problem
again, otherwise, like i said, i turned on the debug mode of the ping ra,
and if i get the next maintenance window, i'll turn on cluster debog mode.
so we'd have more log info to find the reason for this problem.
thx
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:24:35AM +0100, patrik.rappo...@knapp.com wrote:
> we already made changes to the interval and timeout ( id="pingd-op-monitor-30s" interval="30s" name="monitor" timeout="10s"/>).
>
> how big should dampen be set?
>
> please correct me, if i am wrong, as i calculate it as
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 10:21 +0100, Christoph Herrmann wrote:
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Andrew Beekhof
> Gesendet: Di 11.01.2011 09:01
> An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager ;
> CC: Michael Schwartzkopff ;
> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Split-site cluster in two locations
>
>
-Original message-
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager ;
From: Christoph Herrmann
Sent: Tue 11-01-2011 10:24
Subject:Re: [Pacemaker] Split-site cluster in two locations
> As long as you have only two computing centers it doesn't matter if you run a
> corosync
> o
we already made changes to the interval and timeout ().
how big should dampen be set?
please correct me, if i am wrong, as i calculate it as following:
assuming the last check was ok and in the next second, the failures takes
place:
then we there would be 29s till the next check will start, and
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrew Beekhof
Gesendet: Di 11.01.2011 09:01
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager ;
CC: Michael Schwartzkopff ;
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Split-site cluster in two locations
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
>
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28 Dec 2010, at 20:32, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have four nodes in a split site scenario located in two computing centers.
>> STONITH is enabled.
>>
>> Is there and best practise how to deal with this setup
11 matches
Mail list logo
