Re: [Pacemaker] start filesystem like this is right?

2010-11-13 Thread jiaju liu
>> start resource steps >> step(1) >> crm configure primitive?vol_mpath0 ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem meta >> target->role=stopped params device=/dev/mapper/mpath0 >> >directory=/mnt/mapper/mpath0 fstype='lustre' op start timeout=300s? op stop >> >timeout=120s op monitor timeout=120s interval=60

Re: [Pacemaker] symmetric anti-collocation

2010-11-13 Thread Alan Jones
>> I have tried larger values.  If you know of a value that *should* >> work, please share it. > > INFINITY My understanding is that a colocation score of minus infinity will prevent the resources from running on the same node, which in my configuration would result in a loss of availability. The

[Pacemaker] (no subject)

2010-11-13 Thread Bob Schatz
Lunch this week? Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.or

Re: [Pacemaker] symmetric anti-collocation

2010-11-13 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Alan Jones wrote: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Alan Jones wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > colocation X-Y -2: X Y > colocation Y-X -2: Y X the s

Re: [Pacemaker] 2 node failover cluster + MySQL Master-Master replica setup

2010-11-13 Thread Ruzsinszky Attila
> That's what I said - I didn't see it either. > but if you you check the current RA: What do you think about this: http://www.lathiat.net/files/MySQL%20-%20DRBD%20&%20Pacemaker.pdf I can't see if this is a real M-M or M-S setup. TIA, Ruzsi ___ Pacemak

Re: [Pacemaker] symmetric anti-collocation

2010-11-13 Thread Alan Jones
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Alan Jones wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: colocation X-Y -2: X Y colocation Y-X -2: Y X >>> >>> the second one is implied by the first and is therefore redundant

Re: [Pacemaker] Project updates

2010-11-13 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> For those that aren't using RSS readers, I wanted to draw people's >> attention to a couple of updates that went out today. >> >> Nothing dramatic, just a new 1.0 release (and back-an

Re: [Pacemaker] symmetric anti-collocation

2010-11-13 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Alan Jones wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> colocation X-Y -2: X Y >>> colocation Y-X -2: Y X >> >> the second one is implied by the first and is therefore redundant > > If only that were true! It is. I know exactly how my code