Message: 2
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:40:18 +0800 (CST)
From: jiaju liu
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: [Pacemaker] problem about move node from one cluster to
another cluster
Message-ID: <765547.4759...@web15704.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1
Hi Andrew,
> > Funnily enough I was just looking at that message and saw that the
> > code relevant to this one looked wrong too.
> >
> > I believe this should fix the issue:
> >http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/1.1/rev/e06810256413
> >
> > >
> > > I registered log and more with Bugzilla.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> 11.10.2010 09:14, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> strictly speaking you don't.
>> but at least on fedora, the policy is that $x-libs always requires $x
>> so just building against heartbeat-libs means that yum will suck in
>> the main heartbeat
hi everybody
I use command service openais stop first to stop openais service and then use
rm -rf /var/lib/heartbear/crm/* clear all information. then change multicast
address and service openais start in another cluster.
the problem is sometimes it works I can use crm_mon command. a
hi everybody
I use command crm openais stop first to stop openais service and then use rm
-rf /var/lib/heartbear/crm/* clear all information. then change multicast and
start it in another cluster.
the problem is sometimes it works I can use crm_mon command. and sometimes it
doesn't work. I use
11.10.2010 09:14, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> strictly speaking you don't.
> but at least on fedora, the policy is that $x-libs always requires $x
> so just building against heartbeat-libs means that yum will suck in
> the main heartbeat package :-(
And this seem to be a bit incorrect statement btw: u
On Oct 11, 2010, at 2:14 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Shravan Mishra
> wrote:
>> Andrew,
>>
>> We were able to solve our problem. Obviously if no one else is having
>> it then it has to be our environment. It's just that time pressure and
>> mgmt pressure was ca
On 11 October 2010 11:12, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Cluster got an error on monitor and stop action on a resource and
> since then I can't do stop/start/manage/unmanage that resource.
> For some strange reason the actions monitor/stop failed, manually
> worked, but i can't figure out why th
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 03:50:01PM +0300, Dan Frincu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:27:13PM +0300, Dan Frincu wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I have the following setup:
> >>- order drbd0:promote drbd1:promote
> >>- order drbd1:promote drbd2:promote
> >>
Hi,
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:27:13PM +0300, Dan Frincu wrote:
Hi,
I have the following setup:
- order drbd0:promote drbd1:promote
- order drbd1:promote drbd2:promote
- order drbd2:promote all:start
- collocation all drbd2:Master
- all is a group of resources,
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:27:13PM +0300, Dan Frincu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following setup:
> - order drbd0:promote drbd1:promote
> - order drbd1:promote drbd2:promote
> - order drbd2:promote all:start
> - collocation all drbd2:Master
> - all is a group of resources, drbd{0..3} are drbd
On 10 October 2010 17:39, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Pavlos Parissis
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anyone know why PE wants to unpack resources on nodes that will
>> never run due to location constraints?
>
> Because part of its job is to make sure they dont run there.
On 10 October 2010 17:40, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Pavlos Parissis
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> My resource is not started because I get this
>>
>> 00:44:27 crmd: [3141]: WARN: status_from_rc: Action 16
>> (pbx_02_monitor_0) on node-02 failed (target: 7 vs. rc: 5): Error
On 8 October 2010 09:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Pavlos Parissis
> wrote:
>> On 8 October 2010 08:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Pavlos Parissis
>>> wrote:
On 7 October 2010 09:01, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> O
Hi all,
I've managed to make this setup work, basically the issue with a
symmetric-cluster="false" and specifying the resources' location
manually means that the resources will always obey the location
constraint, and (as far as I could see) disregard the rsc_defaults
resource-stickiness valu
15 matches
Mail list logo