On 03/19/10 06:22, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:12:24PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
>> After investigating, I found that Unix domain sockets provide methods to
>> identify the user on the other side of a socket. That means we don't need
>> PAM to do authentication for local access,
Hi
Thanks a lot for your help.
So now it's Novell's turn.:-)
Regards,
Tom
2010/3/18 Dejan Muhamedagic :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:15:07PM +0100, Tom Tux wrote:
>> Hi Dejan
>>
>> hb_report -V says:
>> cluster-glue: 1.0.2 (b75bd738dc09263a578accc69342de2cb2eb8db6)
>
> Yes, unfortu
Hi,
I use VirtualDomain-RA and, on KVM, constitute a cluster.
However, a guest sometimes fails in start.
Mar 16 15:16:52 x3650e lrmd: [13457]: info: RA output:
(guest-kvm1:start:stderr) error: Failed to
start domain kvm1 error: internal error unable to start guest: inet_listen:
bind(ipv4,127.0
Hi,
# crm_mon -1
Stack: openais
Current DC: cspm01 - partition with quorum
Version: 1.0.8-2a76c6ac04bc stable-1.0 tip
2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes
2 Resources configured.
Node cspm02: standby
Online: [ cspm01 ]
Resource Group: UMgroup01
UmDummy03
Hi Andrew,
> I've been extremely busy.
> Sometimes I defer more complex questions until I have time to give
> them my full attention.
I understand that you are busy.
Thank you for comment.
> I don't really understand the question here.
Sorry..
I made a mistake in the link of the former problem.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 07:07:06PM +0100, Pascal Hofmann wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> > Also You have to know that a kernel update last Thursday broke Lennys DRBD
> > module if you installed 8.0.14 from the usual repositories. I hope they fix
> > it
> > in the near future.
(releasing a new binary ker
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:12:24PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
> After investigating, I found that Unix domain sockets provide methods to
> identify the user on the other side of a socket. That means we don't need
> PAM to do authentication for local access, and the clients doesn't need
> to prompt user
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Michael Schwartzkopff
Gesendet: 18.03.2010 21:32:22
An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] WARNING: drbd0: default-action-timeout
>Hi,
>
>new introduced in 1.0.8. If your resources work you can safely ignore this.
>
Hi Michael,
is this
Am Donnerstag, 18. März 2010 21:25:22 schrieb Glauber Cabral:
> Hi Kenneth
>
> I'm new to pacemaker, but I guess that your problem is that the
> timeout for start and stop action are set by default to 20s somewhere
> (it seems it's not defined in your file) and pacemaker is telling you
> there time
Hi Kenneth
I'm new to pacemaker, but I guess that your problem is that the
timeout for start and stop action are set by default to 20s somewhere
(it seems it's not defined in your file) and pacemaker is telling you
there timeouts are shorter then the recomended ones.
So, my suggestion is to defin
Hi all,
Just updated my test cluster to latest 1.0.8 pacemaker (from 1.0.6) and
3.0.2-2 heartbeat (from 3.0.1-1). Was going through my usual configuration
steps, when I ran into a warning I have never seen before in setup. I start my
bare cluster and co cmd-line configuring within the crm shell
Hi List,
> Also You have to know that a kernel update last Thursday broke Lennys DRBD
> module if you installed 8.0.14 from the usual repositories. I hope they fix
> it
> in the near future.
Afaik this was fixed in an update to DRBD last tuesday. (16th of march)
Regards
Pascal
___
On 03/18/10 22:54, Yan Gao wrote:
> On 03/18/10 21:00, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:30:10AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
>
>
> On
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:15:07PM +0100, Tom Tux wrote:
> Hi Dejan
>
> hb_report -V says:
> cluster-glue: 1.0.2 (b75bd738dc09263a578accc69342de2cb2eb8db6)
Yes, unfortunately that one is buggy.
> I've opened a case by Novell. They will fix this problem with updating
> to the newest cluster-
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:00:04PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:30:10AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 03/18/10 17
On 03/18/10 21:00, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:30:10AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
On 03/18/10 17:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
Hi Dejan
hb_report -V says:
cluster-glue: 1.0.2 (b75bd738dc09263a578accc69342de2cb2eb8db6)
I've opened a case by Novell. They will fix this problem with updating
to the newest cluster-glue-release.
Could it be, that I have another configuration-issue in my
cluster-config? I think with the follow
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:30:10AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 03/18/10 17:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
>
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 07:49:04PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> On 03/18/10 19:23, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi Yan,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:12:24PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> On 02/23/10 17:23, Yan Gao wrote:
> >>> On 02/23/10 04:10, Andrew Beekho
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:38:47PM +0100, Tom Tux wrote:
> Hi Dejan
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> I'm using this cluster with the packages from the HAE
> (HighAvailability-Extension)-Repository from SLES11. Therefore, is it
> possible, to upgrade the cluster-glue from source?
Yes, though
Hi Dejan,
On 03/18/10 19:23, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Yan,
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:12:24PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On 02/23/10 17:23, Yan Gao wrote:
>>> On 02/23/10 04:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>>
On 03/18/10 18:30, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/18/10 17:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
On 03/18/10 16:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 07:41:05PM +0100, frank wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 09:20 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>
> > openais or corosync have nothing to do with stonith plugins.
> > /etc/ha.d/ha.cf is used by Heartbeat and while it may be used for
> > stonith configuration it is usually
Hi Junko-san,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:34:28AM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> Thank you for your advice,
>
> I removed /usr/etc/logd.cf first,
> and set use_logd off in corosync.conf.
>
> logging setting in corosync.conf is here,
>
> logging {
> fileline: on
> to_s
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:30:10AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 03/18/10 17:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
> >>> On 03/18/10 16:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2
Hi Yan,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:12:24PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 02/23/10 17:23, Yan Gao wrote:
> > On 02/23/10 04:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
> >>> Hi Andrew,
> >>>
> >>> On 02/08/10 17:48, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Th
applied. thanks!
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Dominik Klein wrote:
> err, yeah. That wasn't right.
>
> Use this one.
>
> Regards
> Dominik
>
> Dominik Klein wrote:
>> Minor Update. Just noticed it doesn't display stickiness=0 if stickiness
>> is unset. So failcound and migration-threshold col
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:32 AM, wrote:
> Hi there,
> I want to realize a rather complex setup, so I have a couple of questions:
>
>
> The cluster (as a shared nothing variant) should provide:
>
> * 4 services (=server) depending on each other.
> * 3 of them can only be realized as active/passiv
2010/3/18 Junko IKEDA :
> Hi,
>
> I run the following resources on two node.
>
> # crm_mon -1
>
>
> Last updated: Thu Mar 18 11:26:54 2010
> Stack: openais
> Current DC: cspm01 - partition with quorum
> Version: 1.0.8-2a76c6ac04bc stable-1.0 tip
> 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes
>
Hi there,
I want to realize a rather complex setup, so I have a couple of questions:
The cluster (as a shared nothing variant) should provide:
* 4 services (=server) depending on each other.
* 3 of them can only be realized as active/passive failover, synched with
DRBD (M/S)
* The servers ru
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
>
>
> On 03/18/10 17:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
>>> On 03/18/10 16:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 02/23/10 17:23, Ya
2010/3/16 Junko IKEDA :
> Hi,
>
> There is just a little strange clone behavior.
> I found that;
>
> (1) start the group which contains three primitive resources,
> and clone set
>
> # crm_mon -1
>
>
> Last updated: Tue Mar 16 21:39:10 2010
> Stack: openais
> Current DC: cspm0
On 03/18/10 17:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
>> On 03/18/10 16:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 02/23/10 17:23, Yan Gao wrote:
> On 02/23/10 04:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
2010/3/17 :
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Please give my question an answer.
I've been extremely busy.
Sometimes I defer more complex questions until I have time to give
them my full attention.
>
> Best Regards,
> Hideo Yamauchi.
>
> --- renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Thank you for c
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
> On 03/18/10 16:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> On 02/23/10 17:23, Yan Gao wrote:
On 02/23/10 04:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Yan Gao wro
You need to wait until the cluster has fully formed before adding resources.
Run "crm_mon" and wait for a DC to be elected, _then_ try adding your resource.
And please send logs as attachments next time.
___
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@oss.clusterl
I committed this instead yesterday:
http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/81a37efb4384
The packages on clusterlabs.org were built with it.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Florian Haas
> # Date 1268813453 -3600
> # Branch stabl
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:17:38AM +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
>> Andrew,
>>
>> now that Pacemaker has been on a bi-monthly release schedule for a
>> while, is there any chance you could consider publishing RCs before the
>> actua
On 03/18/10 16:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On 02/23/10 17:23, Yan Gao wrote:
>>> On 02/23/10 04:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 02/08/10 17:48, Andre
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 02/23/10 17:23, Yan Gao wrote:
>> On 02/23/10 04:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 02/08/10 17:48, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:24
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
> Both version of pingd expose the same problem for me. After fresh
> start CIB doesn't get updated with pingd attributes for the cluster
> nodes so my location rule:
>
> location connected myGroup \
> rule $id="connected-rule" -inf: n
41 matches
Mail list logo
