Separate to my earlier post re CRM DC election in a 2-way cluster, I'm chasing
up the (separate) issue of making the cluster a CROSS-SITE one.
As stated in yay other thread, I'm running a 2-way quorum-agnostic cluster on a
SLES11, openais, pacemaker, drbd (... clvm, ocfs2, ctdb, nfs, etc) on HP
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:00:56PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
>> Hi Dejan,
>>
>> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:01:30PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
..
Hi all
I'm attempting to build a 2-way cluster, SLES-11-based with an
openais/pacemaker stack. I've got the nodes and a resource (a drbd volume)
happening. What I'm not sure about is the active CRM DC election process.
I configured a null stonith resource for each node.
I have stonith-enabled s
These parameters are from the totem protocol implemented by the openais. The
token is the timeout to determine the token loss. The join is the timeout to
send the join message during the gather state. The consensus is the consensus
timeout during the gather state. And the max_message is a flow c
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:15 PM, hj lee wrote:
>
>
>> 2010-01-12 00:19:47.879800 copper1-cib: [4764]: debug: cib_process_xpath:
>> Processing cib_query op for //cib/status//node_sta...@id='
>> copper1.dr.peach.com']//nvpa...@name='master-vmrd-res:0']
>> (/cib/status/node_state[1]/transient_attrib
> > d) If I would try to compile from source as described at
> > http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Install#First_Steps
> > one step is to get openais. Why are all the relevant
> > prebuild library packages called corosync?
> > I don't understand the distinction between openais and corosync
>
read
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:37 PM, hj lee wrote:
>
>
> It happened again, I attched cib files and log messages of both nodes. The
> problem happened last night, but cib file was captured this morning. As you
> can see below log expert, the attrd receives 2 entries for cib_query,
> crm_attribute fa
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 2010-01-09 10:00, cheibi welid wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am currently testing a HA cluster with DRBD (Pacemaker, Heartbeat,
> > DRBD) and i need OCF scripts for cups and courier-imap. I want to know
> > if those scripts already exist or
Hi all,
the installation guide at
http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Initial_Configuration#CoroSync
has an example corosync.conf with some values different than
the defaults described by the man page (corosync 1.2.0).
I would be interested to know why there are different values.
token: 5000 (de
Le Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:56:31 +0100,
Michael Schwartzkopff a écrit :
> Am Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 14:48:12 schrieb Emmanuel Lesouef:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We use a rather old (in fact, very old) combination :
> >
> > heartbeat 2.99 + openhpi 2.12
> >
> > What do you suggest in order to upgrade to the
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:00:56PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:01:30PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
> >> ..
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
Am Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 14:48:12 schrieb Emmanuel Lesouef:
> Hi,
>
> We use a rather old (in fact, very old) combination :
>
> heartbeat 2.99 + openhpi 2.12
>
> What do you suggest in order to upgrade to the latest version of
> pacemaker ?
>
> Thanks.
http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Upgrade
Hi,
We use a rather old (in fact, very old) combination :
heartbeat 2.99 + openhpi 2.12
What do you suggest in order to upgrade to the latest version of
pacemaker ?
Thanks.
Le Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:26:01 +0100,
Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
> Unless there are violent objections, I plan to officiall
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: "Andrew Beekhof"
> Gesendet: 12.01.10 13:29:45
> An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker/OpenAIS Software for openSuSE 11.2
> I'll add 11.2 to the list of repos at http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm/
> when 1.0.7 comes out nex
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: "Andrew Beekhof"
> Gesendet: 12.01.10 13:32:00
> An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker/OpenAIS Software for openSuSE 11.2
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff
> wrote:
> > You could try:
> > http://
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff
wrote:
> You could try:
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/ha-clustering/openSUSE_11.2/
I dont see pacemaker in there, so not sure that helps much.
___
Pacemaker mailing list
Pac
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Andreas Mock wrote:
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: "Andrew Beekhof"
>> Gesendet: 12.01.10 09:19:59
>> An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
>> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker/OpenAIS Software for openSuSE 11.2
>
>
>> > a) Is this the right mailing li
Unless there are violent objections, I plan to officially stop supporting 0.6
at the end of February.
Since I've not seeing any bugs reported for some time, it seems that anyone
still using 0.6 is happy with it for their workload.
Also, 1.0 has been out for over a year now and contains significa
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:01:30PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
>
> Ah, I was looking in the patch.
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Hi Dejan,
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:01:30PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
>> ..
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Am Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 12:24:56 schrieb Andreas Mock:
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: "Andrew Beekhof"
> > Gesendet: 12.01.10 09:19:59
> > An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> > Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker/OpenAIS Software for openSuSE 11.2
> >
> > > a) Is this the right
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: "Andrew Beekhof"
> Gesendet: 12.01.10 09:19:59
> An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker/OpenAIS Software for openSuSE 11.2
> > a) Is this the right mailing list or can I ask pacemaker/openais questions
>
> yes
Good to k
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:01:30PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
Ah, I was looking in the patch.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:01:30PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
> ..
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I understand that the "ref" element re
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Yan Gao wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>>> In the mean-time, reviewing the syntax is probably quite important too.
>>
>> Has it changed since we discussed it last?
> Yes, it has changed a
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>> In the mean-time, reviewing the syntax is probably quite important too.
>
> Has it changed since we discussed it last?
Yes, it has changed a bit comparing to the original design.
> I don't see any n
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:32 PM, hj lee wrote:
> I rebooted the system a few days ago. If it happens again, will post it. But
> can you guess any how cib query returns multiple entries?
Not based on the information so far. Sorry.
___
Pacemaker mailing
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> In the mean-time, reviewing the syntax is probably quite important too.
Has it changed since we discussed it last?
I don't see any new examples to comment on.
___
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacem
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after a long period I started to check out the current state of
> clustering with linux.
>
> As it seems that the SuSE guys go to the direction of pacemaker/openais
> I want to give that a try.
>
> a) Is this the right mailing list
Hi Lars,
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2010-01-11T15:02:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> For this authentication issue of local access we discussed last time, I
>>> added a geteuid() in the cib_native_signon_raw() function from libcib.
>>> Once a client signs on the CIB, it'll invoke the functio
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Yan Gao wrote:
>> Hi all, Andrew, Lars,
>>
>> Here's the status update about this feature.
>>
>> I've implemented the main functionalities of ACL, including the ACLs
>> configuration parser, the CIB output filter and the modifica
31 matches
Mail list logo
