Re: [Pacemaker] ocfs2_controld: Unable to connect to CKPT: Objectdoes not exist

2009-12-31 Thread Daniel Qian
- Original Message - From: "Daniel Qian" To: "Jiaju Zhang" ; Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 11:20 AM Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] ocfs2_controld: Unable to connect to CKPT: Objectdoes not exist - Original Message - From: "Jiaju Zhang" To: "Daniel Qian" Sent: Thursday,

Re: [Pacemaker] ocfs2_controld: Unable to connect to CKPT: Object does not exist

2009-12-31 Thread Daniel Qian
- Original Message - From: hj lee To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org ; Daniel Qian Cc: Jiaju Zhang Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 11:35 AM Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] ocfs2_controld: Unable to connect to CKPT: Object does not exist - Have you installed openais p

Re: [Pacemaker] ocfs2_controld: Unable to connect to CKPT: Object does not exist

2009-12-31 Thread hj lee
> - Have you installed openais package? >>> - ocfs2_controld is using the CKPT service which is provided by openais >>> - not corosync. >>> >>> really? I did not know that. So my best bet is either switch to openais >>> or >>> >> >> You might misunderstand what I said. It is not "switch to openais"

Re: [Pacemaker] Migrate/run resource only if m/s resource is master/promoted on target node (follow-up)

2009-12-31 Thread hj lee
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Martin Gombač wrote: > >> First why do you set max-master=2? So both nodes are promoted and both >> nodes are master. Then your colocation constraints does not make sense. >> Because Hosting has to be started on both nodes. If this is not what you >> want, then pl

Re: [Pacemaker] ocfs2_controld: Unable to connect to CKPT: Object does not exist

2009-12-31 Thread Daniel Qian
- Original Message - From: "Jiaju Zhang" To: "Daniel Qian" Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 3:27 AM Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] ocfs2_controld: Unable to connect to CKPT: Object does not exist On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Daniel Qian wrote: - Original Message - From:

Re: [Pacemaker] Lustre and Multiple Mount Protection

2009-12-31 Thread Bernd Schubert
Hello Dejan, On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:31:27PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote: > > Hello Dejan, > > > > On Thursday 24 December 2009, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > > > No, without Multiple Mount Protection (MMP) the start action would

Re: [Pacemaker] Migrate/run resource only if m/s resource is master/promoted on target node (follow-up)

2009-12-31 Thread Martin Gombač
Hi Hj. First of all thank you for your time. I'm answering below your suggestions. hj lee wrote: I found a few problems in your configuration. First why do you set max-master=2? So both nodes are promoted and both nodes are master. Then your colocation constraints does not make sense. Becaus