Hi,
I have two-node cluster with a simple multi-state clone. I am using "crm_mon
-1 | grep Masters: | awk '{print $3}' " to find out which node is a master.
Is there a better way doing this? I don't like relying on the output of
crm_mon command, because the output can change in the future.
Thanks
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Javen Wu wrote:
>
> As per the conversation on IRC, DC election has nothing to do with quorum.
> But only the DC that also has quorum is able to fence the unseen nodes
> and run resources.
>
> In two-node c
On Wednesday 23 December 2009, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 06:52:34PM +0100, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Lustre Filesystem uses a feature called Multiple Mount Protection to
> > make sure that one device is really only mounted by one node.
> >
>
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:20:32PM +0100, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as said, I updated an other cluster, this time a three node cluster, and I
> took some time with one XEN resource configured to test a bit with it.
> The XEN resource also had the pingd constraint defined.
>
> T
Hi,
as said, I updated an other cluster, this time a three node cluster, and I
took some time with one XEN resource configured to test a bit with it.
The XEN resource also had the pingd constraint defined.
There I observed the following things, see below:
On Monday 21 December 2009 12:44:17 pm
I did that, but it didn't work. At least i fought it didn't, 'cause i
used host command "host ibm1.test.net". Host still resolves to external
IP honoring what servers from /etc/resolv.conf have to say.
But when pinging the ibm1.test.net and after you told me to use hosts
again, now i understan
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 06:52:34PM +0100, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Lustre Filesystem uses a feature called Multiple Mount Protection to make
> sure that one device is really only mounted by one node.
>
> My question now: Is this feature really needed in a pacemaker cluster
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:58:25AM +0100, Martin Gombač wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> i cannot believe no one else has this problem with Xen OCF live
> migration script.
> I guess i have to solve it myself. Is there a meta parameter for Xen
> resources something like: migrate-target?
> I'll try that, i
Hi guys,
i cannot believe no one else has this problem with Xen OCF live
migration script.
I guess i have to solve it myself. Is there a meta parameter for Xen
resources something like: migrate-target?
I'll try that, if not i'll just statically set target_node in Xen OCF.
Regards,
M.
Martin
