One correction: The variable name $__ACTION in my previous mail was wrong,
the correct name is $__OCF_ACTION.
Here rewriting again with correct name:
I am using pacemaker-1.0.5 on CentOS 5.3 with openais cluster stack. I set
up ocf:hearbeat:pingd as a clone and enabled monitor operation. The moni
Hi,
I am using pacemaker-1.0.5 on CentOS 5.3 with openais cluster stack. I set
up ocf:hearbeat:pingd as a clone and enabled monitor operation. The monitor
operation returns $OCF_ERR_UNIMPLEMENTED. I printed $__ACTION variable in
pingd RA, surprisingly that variable is set to pingd-monitor-op, not
Hi,
I´m using 2 CentOS 5.4 node with openais/pacemaker. There is a drbd device in
master/slave modus running on it. When I stop the openais-service
(/etc/init.d/openais stop) on the master-node, the slave-node is not able to
become the new master. Looks like the openais-service is down, but the
On 2009-11-11T14:46:02, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> I went through the possible associations here, and I realize that
> "conjoin" is a rare word in English. In theory though, "conjoin" more
> readily implies an order/merge thing going on compared to "coordinate".
>
> If one wants to be more clea
On 2009-10-01T08:24:44, Mario Giammarco wrote:
A bit late, but I just noticed this.
If you have shared storage, check-out the external/sbd fencing agent.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
On 2009-11-06T22:13:32, Colin wrote:
> > conjoin dummies-dep base-clone {dummy1, dummy2, dummy3, ...} \
> > meta score_collocation=infinity score_order=0
>
> Suppose we allow regular expressions:
>
> order dummy(\d+)-o 0: base-clone dummy#1
>
> (Where \d is a digit, and #1 inserts the s
On 2009-11-05T22:34:32, Tim Serong wrote:
> > > "conjoin" sounds sort of funny to me (as a non-native speaker).
> > Equally so to me, and Australian is kinda like english.
> How about "coordinate"?
I went through the possible associations here, and I realize that
"conjoin" is a rare word in En
On 2009-11-05T12:17:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > Could we introduce an "conjoin" dependency which merges both?
> What about an ordered=(FALSE|true) attribute for colocation constraints?
That sucks completely, IMHO. I already hate the "sequential" attribute
in resource_sets passionately (it's na
On 2009-11-09T10:52:03, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> I just think it would be cool solution to make the cluster itself
> doing the work if condfigured to do so. So the CRM (or the RAs) should
> have the abaility to monitor the resource consumption of resources
> dynamically. This automatism wou
On 2009-11-06T12:45:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> And instead of a limit-utilization option, we'd have
> placement-strategy=(default|utilization|minimal)
>
> Default ::= what we do now
> Utilization ::= what you've implemented
These two are obvious, since we can already do them with existing code
On 2009-11-05T14:45:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Lastly, I would really like to defer this for 1.2
> I know I've bent the rules a bit for 1.0 in the past, but its really
> late in the game now.
Personally, I think the Linux kernel model works really well. ie, no
"major releases" any more, but bug
Hello lepace,
On Wednesday 11 November 2009, lepace wrote:
> Hi,everyone
> I am a newbie,and I am confused when I want to configure ipmi resource
> using pacemaker commandline. 1.The difference between
> stonith:external/ipmi and stonith:ipmilan.which rule should I base on to
> choose between
Hi Steve,
I'm running CentOS5 based x86_64 system, 2.6.31.6 kernel, selinux is disabled,
corosync libraries seem to be properly installed, and I've got big enough
/dev/shm
ramdisk. libc should be OK as well.
I just tried rebuilding all packages from scratch and the problem persists :(
regards
nik
13 matches
Mail list logo
