[Pacemaker] issue upgrading CentOS 5 packages to 1.0.5

2009-08-13 Thread Eric Heydrick
When trying to upgrade from 1.0.4 to 1.0.5 on CentOS 5 I get a yum dependency failure: cluster-glue-0.9-1.1.x86_64 from server_ha-clustering has depsolving problems --> cluster-glue conflicts with heartbeat Pacemaker requires both heartbeat and cluster-glue but cluster-glue conflicts with he

[Pacemaker] Documentation errata

2009-08-13 Thread Dan Urist
This example from page 36 of "Configuration Explained 1.0" fails validation with several errors: > > > > > > > > > > > > > This passes, though I haven't tested yet to see if it actually works. I'm not sure if the "core-hours" meta-attributes also n

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource colocation with a clone

2009-08-13 Thread Brice Figureau
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 14:00 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Brice > Figureau wrote: > > > > > I was wondering if colocating with a clone would work, > > That allows the resource to keep running as long as at least one node > has a copy of the clone running. > Not s

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource colocation with a clone

2009-08-13 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Brice Figureau wrote: > > I was wondering if colocating with a clone would work, That allows the resource to keep running as long as at least one node has a copy of the clone running. Not sure if that helps in your scenario > because as I see > it (certainly a wr

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource colocation with a clone

2009-08-13 Thread Brice Figureau
Hi Diego, On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 18:06 -0400, Diego Julian Remolina wrote: > > Now that's where the things get interesting, I want to relocate the IP > > > > address on another node _if_ nginx fails on the node on which the IP > > runs. > > Are you already addressing network connectivity with pin

Re: [Pacemaker] STONITH Deathmatch Explained

2009-08-13 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2009-08-11T15:44:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> at the pacemaker level there is the dc-deadtime option though, so the >> new node will at least wait a while before trying to shoot anyone. > > Yeah, but dc-deadtime is permanent, and n

Re: [Pacemaker] STONITH Deathmatch Explained

2009-08-13 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2009-08-11T15:44:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > at the pacemaker level there is the dc-deadtime option though, so the > new node will at least wait a while before trying to shoot anyone. Yeah, but dc-deadtime is permanent, and not just for the first formation. Regards, Lars -- Architect

Re: [Pacemaker] Bug in debian packages (http://people.debian.org/~madkiss/ha)

2009-08-13 Thread Ante Karamatić
Andrew Beekhof wrote: > Perfect. Thanks! > > http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/3840e6b5a305 This did the trick and directories are created with correct permissions. New packages for Ubuntu will be available in couple of minutes at the official PPA. Thank you! _

Re: [Pacemaker] Master/Slave resource cannot start

2009-08-13 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Diego Remolina wrote: >> could you instead attach to it with gdb and see what it was doing? > > I will try, but cannot promise it will be soon, beginning of the semester is > very busy and I am not familiar with gdb... gdb aisexec $PID_OF_AISEXEC # where then, for

Re: [Pacemaker] Bug in debian packages (http://people.debian.org/~madkiss/ha)

2009-08-13 Thread Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]
hi On 08/13/2009 08:57 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> Results: >> d-wxr-xr-T 2 kupson kupson 4096 sie 13 00:50 test1 >> drwxr-x--- 2 kupson kupson 4096 sie 13 00:50 test2 > > Perfect. Thanks! > > http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/3840e6b5a305 what about re-checking the permission