Re: [Pacemaker] Two nodes split brain case

2009-02-21 Thread Romi Verma
can we use SBD stonith to solve this issue. On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Priyanka Ranjan wrote: > Thanks Lars for fast reply, > RHCS uses qdisk to resolve this issue . let me explain the two node split > brain situation again , > when node1 reset node2 and node2 comes up it finds that it h

Re: [Pacemaker] SFEX resource agent

2009-02-21 Thread Priyanka Ranjan
> > It is close to impossible to protect against malicious applications from > other cluster nodes. sfex, LVM exclusive activation, and SCSI2/SCSI3 > reservations likewise can be broken - they must be able to be broken, or > else the cluster could never orchestrate a fail-over. I understand your

Re: [Pacemaker] SFEX resource agent

2009-02-21 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2009-02-20T21:07:51, Priyanka Ranjan wrote: > can we create volumegroup or filesystem on this sfex device. i tried but > the sfex daemon failed No. But what you can do is to use one partition as a "lock" and make the other resources depend on it. > other thing i would like to ask is i under

Re: [Pacemaker] Heartbeat 2.99.2+sles11-rc3 and Pacemaker 1.0.2 packages for Debian (experimental)

2009-02-21 Thread Thomas Mueller
> > I have heartbeat 2.99.2+sles11-rc3-1 and pacemaker 1.0.2-2 packages > prepared for Debian Experimental. They should install on top of the > current Debian Unstable (Sid). > > The packages are available at: > http://packages.vergenet.net/experimental/ are the heartbeat 2.99.2+sles11-rc3-1 pa