Hi All ,
It really stange that i have not got any reply .. i am just asking one
simple question does suse 11 openais-pacemaker cluster support persistent
reservation as one of a fencing method or not.
you have to just say yes or no.. Please reply.
waiting for your reply...
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009
Hi All,
do we have any way to encapsulate more than one resource into one . suppose
i have a lvm resource, ip add resource so can i combine both? i know that
we can set constraint to make them dependent on each other but do we have
any other way.
second question i have , is there any way to kill
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:47:59AM +0100, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
> hello simon,
>
> thanks for your work!
>
> Simon Horman wrote:
> > I have made preliminary packages for Debian experimental,
> > which should work with Debian unstable (sid). They are
> > also likely to work on Debian stable (
hi,
i fail to start heartbeat 1.0.2 (build from horm's debian sources)
on debian lenny.
i tried the following:
1) i have a pacemaker 1.0.2-pre-f228d820ba27 cluster up and running
a two node cluster consisting of wc01 and wc02.
2) i put wc01 on standby and upgraded to 1.0.2 (horm's debian
s
Please help .
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Glory Smith wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am really very confused. I had few discussions on Persistent reservation
> but didnot get any clear answer.
>
> i just need one answer. does Suse 11 openais-pacemaker cluster support
> Persistent Reservation fencing
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Far later than I had hoped, but here is the latest and greatest from the
> Pacemaker project.
thank you for your efforts! the release happened faster than i expected.
i have to say that pacemaker 1.0.2 seems to be a very decent release.
a lot of bugs have been fixed and it
hello simon,
thanks for your work!
Simon Horman wrote:
> I have made preliminary packages for Debian experimental,
> which should work with Debian unstable (sid). They are
> also likely to work on Debian stable (lenny), although
> I have not made any attempts to verify this.
what about amd64 bin
On Feb 17, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Romi Verma wrote:
ok let me explain it bit more.
i have configured lvm resource in cluster and it is running on node
A . as expected the vg is active on node A
but from node B , if i do vgchange -a y , it becomes
active on node B also .and this is not affec
ok let me explain it bit more.
i have configured lvm resource in cluster and it is running on node A . as
expected the vg is active on node A
but from node B , if i do vgchange -a y , it becomes active on
node B also .and this is not affecting the lvm resource. lvm resource is
running fine on no
On Feb 17, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Romi Verma wrote:
Hi All,
i have just configured LVM resouce agent in pacemaker cluster. i am
kind of suprised as it is not taking care of exclusive activation.
am i missing something or LVM Resouce agent is written in this way
only. can anyone put some light
Hi All,
i have just configured LVM resouce agent in pacemaker cluster. i am kind of
suprised as it is not taking care of exclusive activation.
am i missing something or LVM Resouce agent is written in this way only. can
anyone put some light here.
Thanks,
_
Hi All,
I am really very confused. I had few discussions on Persistent reservation
but didnot get any clear answer.
i just need one answer. does Suse 11 openais-pacemaker cluster support
Persistent Reservation fencing as RHCS does.
if yes then which stonith should be used for this.
Regards,
_
Hello Romi
> and if on_fail=fence then it will never retry to start the resource on the
> same node , it will just failover the resource to another node and shoot the
> errant node immediately.
The following explanation is just for in case you didn't know that.
"failover the resource" => "shoot
13 matches
Mail list logo
