[OSGeoLive] Motion: Propose to give Felicity Brand with permission to approve pull requests to OSGeo docs

2019-11-05 Thread Cameron Shorter
Hi OSGeoLive PSC, Felicity Brand is a senior technical writer reviewing OSGeo Quickstarts. To date I've been really impressed with the quality of her suggestions and reviews. As such, I'd like to propose that we provide Felicity with permissions to accept pull requests to the OSGeoLive docs. T

Re: [OSGeoLive] Motion: Propose to give Felicity Brand with permission to approve pull requests to OSGeo docs

2019-11-05 Thread Angelos Tzotsos
Hi Cameron, I am not against granting Felicity write permissions, but the whole idea of pull requests is to have a review by someone else before merging. Felicity can continue working on her own fork (as Vicky did with the migration to the cmake build system and Transifex) without needing to

Re: [OSGeoLive] Motion: Propose to give Felicity Brand with permission to approve pull requests to OSGeo docs

2019-11-05 Thread Cameron Shorter
Yes, I agree that we should have people review each other's work. We are seeing a few different workflows emerge of Felicity's work. Either: 1. Felicity provides a pull request for someone else to merge. 2. Felicity provides suggestion, someone else applies the changes (and whatever else they

Re: [OSGeoLive] Motion: Propose to give Felicity Brand with permission to approve pull requests to OSGeo docs

2019-11-05 Thread Angelos Tzotsos
+1 Angelos On 11/5/19 8:59 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: Yes, I agree that we should have people review each other's work. We are seeing a few different workflows emerge of Felicity's work. Either: 1. Felicity provides a pull request for someone else to merge. 2. Felicity provides suggestion,