Hello Hui,
Looks interesting. My first impression for these drafts is that the local-mac,
another capwap model, has also supported EAP. Why do you need split-mac for EAP
particularly?
BTW, the right place in the IETF to discuss them would be capwap but it has
already closed. Does the IETF work
Hui,
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Hui Deng wrote:
> Hello Satoru,
>
> Thanks a lot for your comments,
>
> I guess it is not clear in our document, because chapter says.
> 3. Supporting EAP authencation in Wifi network . . . . . . . . . . 3
> 3.1. Scenario Description . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hi Zhen,
On 2012/10/19, at 11:16, Zhen Cao wrote:
> My question is why local-mac couldn't solve your problem. As far as I
> know, any local-mac mode AP needs to encapsulate EAP packet into
> neither CAPWAP-DATA nor CTL
>
> as far as i understand, the local-mac mode will encapsulate the CAPWAP
>
Hi Zhen,
On 2012/10/19, at 12:08, Zhen Cao wrote:
> > My question is why local-mac couldn't solve your problem. As far as I
> > know, any local-mac mode AP needs to encapsulate EAP packet into
> > neither CAPWAP-DATA nor CTL
> >
> > as far as i understand, the local-mac mode will encapsulate the
Zhen, Rong,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 6:47 PM, wrote:
>
> Hello Satoru,
>
> If you kind help to start the survey, we can support you as well.
>
I think I can help you anything what I can do. But if you want to
achieve your goal, you need much more support from the community. I
believe that the fi
Hui,
On 2012/10/21, at 22:47, Hui Deng wrote:
> For the difference of split mac and Local Mac, it's all of matter of either
> 802.11 or 802.3 over CAPWAP Ctrl/Data Tunnel.
>
> For Local Mac, all functions will be based on AC, because 802.11 will be
> terminated at AC other than AP. This is th
Hi, I support both.
cheers,
--satoru
On 2013/04/11, at 23:36, Melinda Shore wrote:
> This is a call for working group adoption of two drafts
> related to capwap use for 802.11n.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-shao-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac-00.txt
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-opsawg-capw
Hi OPSAWG,
I think that the GTP-U IPFIX IEs in the following draft are well defined.
It seems that the draft is ready to move forward.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-voyersriram-opsawg-ipfix-gtpu/
As a mobile network operator, I would say that it is helpful if IPFIX
supports GTP-U traffi
