Re: [OPSAWG] draft-spiegel-ippm-ioam-rawexport

2024-03-18 Thread Reshad Rahman
Hi Thomas, By "IOAM dimension fields", are you referring to fields such as ingress/egress intf id etc in IOAM data? And you are requesting for these fields to be included to facilitate aggregation by another entity (e.g the aggregating mediator in RFC7015)? i.e you are not requesting for the IO

[OPSAWG]Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-04

2025-01-22 Thread Reshad Rahman
2025 at 05:25:39 PM EST, Reshad Rahman via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Reshad Rahman Review result: Ready with Issues Disclaimer: I am not a TACACS+ nor a TLS expert. Overall the document looks good. Here are what I perceive are issues which should be addressed. "leaf address&

[OPSAWG]Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-04

2025-01-27 Thread Reshad Rahman
boucad...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2025 6:21 PM To: Reshad Rahman ; yang-doct...@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG]Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-04   Hi Reshad,  

[OPSAWG]Re: draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-11 ietf last call Yangdoctors review

2025-05-07 Thread Reshad Rahman
> -Message d'origine- > De : Reshad Rahman via Datatracker > Envoyé : mardi 6 mai 2025 23:37 > À : yang-doct...@ietf.org > Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang@ietf.org; > opsawg@ietf.org > Objet : draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-11 ietf last

[OPSAWG]Re: draft-ietf-opsawg-discardmodel

2025-03-27 Thread Reshad Rahman
Hi, Small preference for option 2, reason being the unwieldy aspect of option 3. And having to push 2 documents together is nothing new. Regards,Reshad. On Thursday, March 27, 2025 at 02:25:07 PM GMT+1, Evans, John wrote: Hi Mahesh, Thanks for your feedback. Given we have the other

[OPSAWG]Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-04

2025-01-22 Thread Reshad Rahman via Datatracker
Reviewer: Reshad Rahman Review result: Ready with Issues Disclaimer: I am not a TACACS+ nor a TLS expert. Overall the document looks good. Here are what I perceive are issues which should be addressed. "leaf address": it is of type inet:host, so is not necessarily an IP address as pe

[OPSAWG]Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-05

2025-03-27 Thread Reshad Rahman via Datatracker
Reviewer: Reshad Rahman Review result: Ready I have reviewed the changes from -04 and -05. Thank you for addressing my previous review comments @ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-04-yangdoctors-early-rahman-2025-01-22/, no further comments

[OPSAWG]draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-11 ietf last call Yangdoctors review

2025-05-06 Thread Reshad Rahman via Datatracker
Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang Title: A YANG Data Model for Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) Reviewer: Reshad Rahman Review result: Ready I have reviewed the changes between -05 (my previous review) and -11. The document is ready. I do have 1