the IANA so that consistent referencing is used.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : Martin Duke via Datatracker
> > Envoyé : mercredi 17 avril 2024 00:55
> > À : tsv-...@ietf.org
> > Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes@ietf.
o a better community for this conversation?
Thanks
Martin Duke
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:57 PM Michael Richardson
wrote:
>
> Don't the CDNs, and "Big Tech" companies basically inhouse develope many of
> their own L4 load balancers? So if you have
> Apple/Azure/Facebook/Google...?
>
> --
> Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>Sande
That seems like a reasonable decision.
Rather than be oblique about it, could we just say part of this in the
draft, to the effect of
"While the IETF published one of the specifying documents for RPS
[RFC], effective change control for RPSL today lies with the RIPE
community [ref]. However, i
Yes, Randy clearly understands this best, and I believe his proposal
explains it well.
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:43 PM George Michaelson wrote:
> I also think Randy's version is better because of two things:
>
> 1) it aligns with reality: fields are added to RPSL as a response of
> operator driv
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
Reviewer: Martin Duke
Review result: Ready with Nits
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-11: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
12 matches
Mail list logo
