_
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
--
Loa Anderssonemail: l...@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert l...@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
nd that you supports the document - after
all you are co-author; but please note that the IETF consensus
process does not work by voting". And maybe a pointer to the
Tao of IETF.
/Loa
On 2013-09-10 13:39, Melinda Shore wrote:
On 9/10/2013 3:29 AM, Loa Andersson wrote:
Melinda,
in general
Warren,
On 2016-02-08 04:18, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Friday, February 5, 2016, Zhoutianran mailto:zhoutian...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Oh, really? I would like to know.
Bribery with cookies usually works well, for really big things, bribery
with a funny hat...
do I read this right if I u
On 2016-02-09 00:50, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 10:50 PM Loa Andersson mailto:l...@pi.nu>> wrote:
Warren,
On 2016-02-08 04:18, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, February 5, 2016, Zhoutianran mailto:zhoutia
for in-band to have a consistent rule with the OOB acronym (i.e. ib-OAM and oob-OAM)
My 2 cents
Italo
From: Greg Mirsky
Sent: mercoledì 13 dicembre 2023 04:13
To: DetNet WG ; mpls ; 6man WG ; IETF IPPM WG ; opsawg ; Pascal Thubert ; Loa Andersson
Subject: [mpls] IOAM, iOAM, and oOAM
Stewart and Adrian,
Sent from my iPad
> On 18 Dec 2023, at 18:24, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 16 Dec 2023, at 10:16, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>>
>> Personally, I don’t get the value of “inb-OAM” compared with “in-band OAM”.
>> It’s not like it can be said faster (one additional syllable
nt to make this a more general guidance than just to refer
to RFC 9197.
I also think we should make "OAM" well-known, so we don't have to expand
it when we use e.g. "In situ OAM" in a title.
Other than that I support adopting the draft as a working group draft.
/Lo
