Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-09.txt

; Group WG of the IETF. > > Title : Service Assurance for Intent-based Networking > Architecture > Authors : Benoit Claise > Jean Quilbeuf > Diego R. Lopez > Dan Voyer >

Re: [OPSAWG] AD Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-09

Hi Rob, Thank you very much for your review. I believe that we have addressed most comments in the last version https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-10 See below for more details on the comment we did not answer. Best, Jean > -Original Messa

Re: [OPSAWG] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-13: (with COMMENT)

Hello Med and Eric, I have added the reference to draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm in the sain architecture draft. https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-11 Thanks ! Jean > -Original Message- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@iet

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-11.txt

directories. > This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working > Group WG of the IETF. > > Title : Service Assurance for Intent-based Networking > Architecture > Authors : Benoit Claise >

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-07

Hi Rob, Thank you very much for you detailed review. The latest version should address most of the comments. The diff is here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-08 Answers to some unanswered or added details are inline below. Thanks Again Best, Jean >

Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-quilbeuf-opsawg-configuration-tracing-00.txt

during the OPSAWG session at IETF 115. In the meantime, any feedback is welcome. Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] > Sent: Thursday 20 October 2022 09:59 > To: Diego R. Lopez ; Benoit Claise > ; Diego Lopez ;

[OPSAWG] FW: New Version Notification for draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-05.txt

age- > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] > Sent: Monday 24 October 2022 19:37 > To: Diego R. Lopez ; Benoit Claise > ; Diego Lopez ; > Ignacio Dominguez ; Ignacio > Martinez-Casanueva ; Jean > Quilbeuf ; Thomas Graf > > Subject: New Version

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-07

mber 2022 15:22 > To: Jean Quilbeuf ; opsawg@ietf.org; draft- > ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang@ietf.org > Subject: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-07 > > Hi Jean, > > Just one further question inline ... > > > -----Original Message

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-07

means health-score is not available: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-09 Thanks, Jean > -Original Message- > From: Rob Wilton (rwilton) [mailto:rwil...@cisco.com] > Sent: Sunday 6 November 2022 16:12 > To: Jean Quilbeuf ; opsawg@iet

Re: [OPSAWG] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-11

Hi Christian, Thanks for your review. We tried to address the comments, see our answers inline. The diff of the whole draft is here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12 Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: Christian Huitema via Dat

Re: [OPSAWG] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-11

Hi Bron, Thanks for the reviews. We tried to address your comments, see answers inline. The diff is here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12 Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: Bron Gondwana via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.or

Re: [OPSAWG] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-11

Hi Mirja, Thanks for your reviews, we tried to address your comments iniline. The diff is here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12 Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org] > Sen

Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: (Service Assurance for Intent-based Networking Architecture) to Informational RFC

Hello Tom, Thanks for your review. We tried to address your comments, see inline. Diff is here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12 Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: tom petch [mailto:daedu...@btconnect.com] > Sent: Wednesday 9 Nov

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12.txt

; Group WG of the IETF. > > Title : Service Assurance for Intent-based Networking > Architecture > Authors : Benoit Claise > Jean Quilbeuf > Diego R. Lopez > Dan

Re: [OPSAWG] [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-11 [RESEND]

Hi Paul, Thanks for your review. We tried to address your comments, see our answers inline. The diff is here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12 Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu] > Sent

Re: [OPSAWG] Last Call: (YANG Modules for Service Assurance) to Proposed Standard

Hi Tom, Thanks for your comments, we tried to address them (see below). The diff of the changes is here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10 Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: tom petch [mailto:daedu...@btconnect.com] > Sent: Wedn

Re: [OPSAWG] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-09

Hello Dan, Thanks for the review, you’ll find our answers inline. The full diff is here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10 Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org] > Sent: Monday 14 Nov

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-09

Hi Bo, Thanks for your comments. Please find our answers inline. The full diff is here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10 Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: Bo Wu via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org] > Sent: Monday 21 November 202

Re: [OPSAWG] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Eric, Thanks for your comment. No new draft revision yet, but you’ll find below answers to discuss and comment, including modification that we plan to do. Michal Vaško did the early YANG doctor review. Since there are modifications planned to the YANG module in this mail, I added him in Cc.

Re: [OPSAWG] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Roman, Thanks for your review, You will find our answer below. Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org] > Sent: Wednesday 14 December 2022 14:28 > To: The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architect...@ietf.org; opsa

Re: [OPSAWG] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

co.com] > Sent: Thursday 15 December 2022 07:13 > To: Jean Quilbeuf ; The IESG > > Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-y...@ietf.org; opsawg- > cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; m...@sandelman.ca; tpa...@apple.com; > mva...@cesnet.cz > Subject: Re: Éric Vyncke's Disc

Re: [OPSAWG] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: (with COMMENT)

Hi Paul, Your comments should be addressed in the published version: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-11 Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org] > Sent: Thursday 15 December 2022 0

Re: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01

Dear All, I support the adoption of this draft. I have a few very minor comments below. Best, Jean Section 1, paragraph 4: OLD "Since these IPFIX IEs are performance metrics [RFC8911], they must be registered as registered performance metrics [RFC8911] in the "IANA ..." NEW "Since t

Re: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01

Hi Thomas and Benoit, The changes are perfectly addressing my comments, thanks. Best, Jean From: Benoit Claise Sent: Thursday 5 January 2023 13:19 To: thomas.g...@swisscom.com; Jean Quilbeuf ; zhoutianran=40huawei@dmarc.ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org Cc: draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-teleme

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for presentation//FW: [116all] IETF 116 Preliminary Agenda

Dear Tiaran, I would like to present the updates on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-quilbeuf-opsawg-configuration-tracing/ even if that draft is actually targeting the NETCONF WG. 10 minutes would be sufficient Best, Jean -Original Message- From: OPSAWG On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou

Re: [OPSAWG] POLL FOR IPR: A Data Manifest for Contextualized Telemetry Data

Hi Joe, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Best, Jean From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Monday, May 1, 2023 11:20 PM To: Benoit Claise ; Jean Quilbeuf ; IGNACIO DOMINGUEZ MARTINEZ-CASANUEVA ; diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com; Thomas.Graf Cc: opsawg@ietf.org Subject:

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-01.txt

and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF. Title : A Data Manifest for Contextualized Telemetry Data Authors : Benoit Claise Jean Quilbeuf Diego R. Lopez Ignacio Dominguez

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-02.txt

f the IETF. Title: A Data Manifest for Contextualized Telemetry Data Authors: Benoit Claise Jean Quilbeuf Diego R. Lopez Ignacio Dominguez Thomas Graf Name:draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-02.txt Pages: 51 Dates: 2023-

Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR PRESENTATIONS: Submit requests for IETF 118

Dear OPSAWG chairs, We would like to present updates in draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-02 10 minutes would be great. Thanks Jean From: OPSAWG On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Friday, October 13, 2023 10:30 PM To: opsawg@ietf.org Cc: ops-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] CALL

Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR PRESENTATIONS: Submit requests for IETF 118

Hi Joe, It will be either Benoit locally or me remotely. Best, Jean From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 4:27 PM To: Jean Quilbeuf ; opsawg@ietf.org Cc: ops-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: CALL FOR PRESENTATIONS: Submit requests for IETF 118 Who is presenting and will they be

Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-jouqui-netmod-yang-full-include-00.txt

, November 6, 2023 11:04 AM To: Benoit Claise ; Jean Quilbeuf ; Thomas Joubert Subject: New Version Notification for draft-jouqui-netmod-yang-full-include-00.txt A new version of Internet-Draft draft-jouqui-netmod-yang-full-include-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Jean Quilbeuf and posted to

Re: [OPSAWG] Comments on draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-06

Hi Jan, Many thanks for your comments, they make a lot of sense to me. The current working version (not in datatracker yet) is here: https://github.com/JeanQuilbeufHuawei/draft-collected-data-manifest/blob/46-comments-from-jan-lindblad/draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-03.txt The diff is

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for presentations at IETF119

Dear OPSAWG chairs, I would like to request a slot for draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-03 which will be posted soon! I might present remotely or Benoit Claise might present in person. 10 minutes should be enough. Best, Jean From: OPSAWG On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou Sent: Sunday, Februa

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-03.txt

Contextualized Telemetry Data > Authors: Benoit Claise > Jean Quilbeuf > Diego R. Lopez > Ignacio Dominguez > Thomas Graf >Name:draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-03.txt >Pages: 53 >Dates: 2024-03-04 &

[OPSAWG]Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-04.txt

emetry Data > Authors: Benoit Claise > Jean Quilbeuf > Diego R. Lopez > Ignacio Dominguez > Thomas Graf >Name:draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-04.txt >Pages: 46 >Dates: 2024-07-08 > > A

[OPSAWG]Re: REQUEST FOR PRESENTATIONS: Opsawg 120 session

Dear OPSAWG chairs, I would like to request a 10min slot for presenting the updates on draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-04. I will be presenting in Vancouver. Best, Jean From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Friday, June 28, 2024 4:10 PM To: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG]REQUEST FOR PRE

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-02.txt

-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : YANG Modules for Service Assurance Authors : Benoit Claise Jean

[OPSAWG] Specifying protocols in draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest

Dear All, We are wondering whether to add information about protocols in the data manifest draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest/ Details are here https://github.com/JeanQuilbeufHuawei/draft-collected-data-manifest/issues/9 (that git repo contains

Re: [OPSAWG] Specifying protocols in draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest

: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou Sent: Wednesday 9 February 2022 13:04 To: Jean Quilbeuf ; opsawg Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Specifying protocols in draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest Hi Jean, I am a little confused about this manifest? Can we just read from

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03.txt

Architecture > Authors : Benoit Claise > Jean Quilbeuf > Diego R. Lopez > Dan Voyer > Thangam Arumugam > Filename: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture- &

[OPSAWG] FW: New Version Notification for draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-01.txt

tps://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-01 Best > -Original Message- > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] > Sent: Monday 7 March 2022 18:26 > To: Diego R. Lopez ; Benoit Claise > ; Diego Lopez ; > Ignacio Domi

Re: [OPSAWG] Comments on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-02

Hi Joe, Thanks for your comments. > First, what is the purpose of assurance-graph-version?  It's a 32-bit counter > that can increment when something goes in and out of maintenance (+2).  I can > easily see this wrapping fir services with a lot of churn.  What is the > impact of that?  Is this

Re: [OPSAWG] Comments on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-02

co.com] > Sent: Thursday 24 March 2022 12:42 > To: Benoit Claise ; Jean > Quilbeuf ; opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Comments on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance- > yang-02 > > On 3/24/22 08:21, Benoit Claise wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > > > On 3/24/2022 11:4

Re: [OPSAWG] Comments on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-02

> -Original Message- > From: tom petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com] > Sent: Thursday 21 April 2022 17:04 > To: Jean Quilbeuf ; Joe Clarke (jclarke) > ; mohamed.boucad...@orange.com; > Benoit Claise ; opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Comments on draft-ietf-ops

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-04.txt

Operations and Management Area Working > Group WG of the IETF. > > Title : YANG Modules for Service Assurance > Authors : Benoit Claise > Jean Quilbeuf > Paolo Lucente >

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-04.txt

issues such as the prefixes in IANA section and some minor text edits. Thanks again, Jean > -Original Message- > From: tom petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com] > Sent: Friday 29 April 2022 12:07 > To: Jean Quilbeuf ; opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-05 and draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03

Hello, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Best Regards, Jean From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou Sent: Thursday 9 June 2022 07:16 To: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] IPR poll for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-05 and draf

Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03

Hi Med, thanks again for your extensive review. For the benefit of the list, I reproduced your high-level comments here and add some answers. The diff is here https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-04 for all the details. Title: MED: "A YANG-based

Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03

ce or network model enables a finer interpretation, notably including details that are not part of the device model, such as VPN sites, but requires more implementation effort as more models need to be processed. I tried to clarify that in the text. Thank you. Cheers, Med De : Jean Quilbeu

Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03

Hi Med, Thanks for the suggestion, I am putting your first proposition (with references directly in the text) in the temporary version for the next iteration. Best, Jean From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com] Sent: Thursday 23 June 2022 06:49 To: Jean Quilbeuf

Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-05

Hi Med, thanks again for your very thorough comments on the draft about the YANG  modules for service assurance. The diff is here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-06 I think that I addressed most of your comments. The main one remaining is: About mainte

Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03

Hi Bo, Thanks a lot for your comments. I addressed them in the current version:  https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-06. For point 1: clarified that service is linked to what the service orchestrator is orchestrating. I hope that this solves the is

Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03

Hi Dhruv, Your comments have been taken into account in the last version: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-07 Thanks again Jean From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Tuesday 28 June 2022 14:52 To: Benoit Cla

Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03

Hi Med, That’s fixed in the last version https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-07 Thanks again Jean From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com] Sent: Tuesday 28 June 2022 13:36 To: Jean Quilbeuf ; Wubo (lana) ; Tianran

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-07.txt

d Management Area Working > Group WG of the IETF. > > Title : YANG Modules for Service Assurance > Authors : Benoit Claise > Jean Quilbeuf > Paolo Lucente > Paolo Fasa

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-08.txt

; This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working > Group WG of the IETF. > > Title : Service Assurance for Intent-based Networking > Architecture > Authors : Benoit Claise > Jean Quilbeuf >

[OPSAWG]Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-05.txt

ifest for Contextualized Telemetry Data > Authors: Benoit Claise > Jean Quilbeuf > Diego R. Lopez > Ignacio Dominguez > Thomas Graf >Name:draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-05.txt >Pages: 39 >Dates: 2024-

[OPSAWG]Re: IPR POLL: A Data Manifest for Contextualized Telemetry Data

Hello All, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Best, Jean From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 6:28 PM To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) ; opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG]Re: IPR POLL: A Data Manifest for Contextualized Telemetry Data My copy and paste skills

[OPSAWG]Re: WG LAST CALL: A Data Manifest for Contextualized Telemetry Data

Hi Joe, Thank you very much for your detailed comments, they should have been addressed. The diff is here: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-06 Answer to the major comments is inline. Best, Jean From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Monday, January

[OPSAWG]Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-05

Hi Med, Thank you very much for your detailed comments, they should have been addressed. The diff is here: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-06 I provide some answers to your comments inline. Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: Mo

[OPSAWG]Re: Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-05

Hi Qiufang, Thanks you very much for your comments. The diff is here: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-06 Some answers to your comments are provided inline. Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: Qiufang Ma via Datatracker > Sent:

[OPSAWG]Re: WG LAST CALL: A Data Manifest for Contextualized Telemetry Data

Hi Zhuoyao, Thanks for your comments. The diff is here: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-06 Answer to your comments are provided below. Best, Jean From: Zhuoyao Lin Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2025 12:18 PM To: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG

[OPSAWG]Re: WG LAST CALL: A Data Manifest for Contextualized Telemetry Data

Hi Alex, Thank you very much for your comments. I provided some answers inline. The diff is here:  https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-05&url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-06&difftype=--html

[OPSAWG]Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-05

/med_comments_06/docs/latest-diff.html Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com > Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 2:16 PM > To: Jean Quilbeuf ; ops- > d...@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest@ietf.org; > last-c...@ietf.org; > o

[OPSAWG]Re: Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-05

ifest/refs/heads/qiufang_comments/docs/latest-diff.html Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: maqiufang (A) > Sent: Friday, March 7, 2025 6:39 AM > To: Jean Quilbeuf ; yang-doct...@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest@ietf.org; > last-c...

[OPSAWG]Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-07.txt

ea Working Group > (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF. > >Title: A Data Manifest for Contextualized Telemetry Data > Authors: Benoit Claise > Jean Quilbeuf > Diego R. Lopez > Ignacio Dominguez > Thomas Graf >Name:dr

[OPSAWG]Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-08.txt

emetry Data > Authors: Benoit Claise > Jean Quilbeuf > Diego R. Lopez > Ignacio Dominguez > Thomas Graf >Name:draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-08.txt >Pages: 41 >Dates: 2025-06-27 > > Abstract: &

[OPSAWG]Re: Shepherd procedural review of draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest

Dear All, I am happy to be an author. I did the changes about the references in my working copy. Diff here: https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://raw.githubusercontent.com/JeanQuilbeufHuawei/draft-collected-data-manifest/refs/heads/comments_08/docs/latest-diff.html Best, Jean From: IGNACIO DOM

[OPSAWG]Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-09.txt

e: A Data Manifest for Contextualized Telemetry Data > Authors: Benoit Claise > Jean Quilbeuf > Diego R. Lopez > Ignacio Dominguez > Thomas Graf >Name:draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-09.txt >Pages: 42 >D