Hi Med,
It is non-blocking and was something that caught my eye for potential future
controverse. If it is decided to keep the text then all good for me also
G/
-Original Message-
From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 9:55 AM
To: Gunter van de Velde (Nokia) ;
Hi Gunter,
There are many OPS-related protocols out there for which we don't have a home
(IPFIX, DIAMETER, etc.). OPSAWG should not be the place to develop major
changes (e.g. new versions) of these protocols.
For example, we used to have opsawg be tagged as maintenance group for RADIUS
(http
The IESG has received a request from the Operations and Management Area
Working Group WG (opsawg) to consider the following document: - 'Terminal
Access Controller Access-Control System Plus over TLS 1.3
(TACACS+ over TLS)'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next
Mohamed Boucadair has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-opsawg-04-04: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
The document, along with
Gunter Van de Velde has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-opsawg-04-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
The document,
