[OPSAWG]I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-17.txt

2025-04-05 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-17.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF. Title: Export of Delay Performance Metrics in IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Authors: Thomas Graf

[OPSAWG]Re: WG LAST CALL: Export of Delay Performance Metrics in IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX)

2025-04-05 Thread Thomas.Graf
Dear Giuseppe and OPSAWG chairs, Apologies. I just noticed that I missed to publish -17 after the cutoff window re-opened. Best wishes Thomas From: Giuseppe Fioccola Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 2:59 PM To: Graf Thomas, INI-NET-VNC-E2E ; jclarke=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org Su

[OPSAWG]Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-18

2025-04-05 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Russ, You should have a “correct review” button under “review” (Assignment) at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-18-secdir-lc-housley-2025-03-08/ Cheers Med De : Russ Housley Envoyé : jeudi 3 avril 2025 19:28 À : Joe Clarke (jclarke) Cc : Douglas Gash (dcmgash)

[OPSAWG]Re: RFC5706 (Refresh): Guidelines for Considering Operations and Management

2025-04-05 Thread Samier Barguil Giraldo (Nokia)
Hi Med, Please count me as a contributor as well. Samier Barguil From: thomas.g...@swisscom.com Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 12:15 PM To: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com; jclarke=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org; ops-...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; adr...@olddog.co.uk Cc: cmpig...@ncsu.edu Subject: [OP

[OPSAWG]Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-discardmodel-05.txt

2025-04-05 Thread Evans, John
Thanks for your feedback Benoit – we will change the references accordingly in the next revision. Cheers John From: Benoit Claise Date: Saturday 15 March 2025 at 10:38 To: opsawg Subject: [OPSAWG]Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-discardmodel-05.txt Dear all, I browsed through the diffs.

[OPSAWG]Re: OPSAWG recharrting

2025-04-05 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
(1) I think that we need to have text to formally endorse the dispatch function for the ops area. (2) I would simplify this part as the message seems to be redundant: "The OPSAWG will serve as the forum for developing such work items in the IETF. The OPSAWG mailing list is an open discussion

[OPSAWG]Re: OPSAWG recharrting

2025-04-05 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Benoît, all, Thanks for starting this. Please find below some comments: (1) I think that we need to have text to formally endorse the dispatch function for the ops area. (2) I would simplify this part as the message seems to be redundant: "The OPSAWG will serve as the forum for developing s