[OPSAWG]Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-18

2025-03-13 Thread Russ Housley
This approach works for me. Russ > On Mar 13, 2025, at 5:33 AM, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) > wrote: > > Just to confirm, there are three authentication methods (Cert, PSK, RPK). > Cert MUST be implemented, the other two MAY be implemented, as they become > mature. > > We have made two specific

[OPSAWG]Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-18

2025-03-13 Thread Douglas Gash (dcmgash)
Many Thanks Qin, We’ll clean up the nits doc for the next revision (19) From: Qin Wu via Datatracker Date: Thursday, 13 March 2025 at 08:26 To: ops-...@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13@ietf.org , last-c...@ietf.org , opsawg@ietf.org Subject: Opsdir last call review of draft-ie

[OPSAWG]Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-18

2025-03-13 Thread Douglas Gash (dcmgash)
Hi Russ, Med, Just to confirm, there are three authentication methods (Cert, PSK, RPK). Cert MUST be implemented, the other two MAY be implemented, as they become mature. We have made two specific changes, which we hope will clarify: 1. We have indicated that the two options (PSK and RPK) a

[OPSAWG]Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-18

2025-03-13 Thread Qin Wu via Datatracker
Reviewer: Qin Wu Review result: Has Nits I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments th