Hi Éric,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
Orange Restricted
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
> Envoyé : mardi 14 janvier 2025 17:16
> À : The IESG
> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circ...@ietf.org; opsawg-
> cha...@ietf.org;
Hi Med
Thanks much for your time in reviewing. We will discuss on this and get back to
you soon.
Regards
--Sriram
From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
Date: Thursday, 9 January 2025 at 7:53 PM
To: Sriram Gopalakrishnan (sriragop) , opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org , Dan-work Voyer ,
thomas
Dear all,
As the new document shepherd, I've been spending some time reviewing the
draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization draft, the mailing list feedback,
the WG presentation (oh surprise: this draft was only presented once, in
IETF 119 , when it was still an individual draft), trying to unde
As the IPR poll has concluded (no IPR has been reported), the authors and
chairs would like to call for adoption of
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gasser-opsawg-prefix-lengths/ . Please
reply on-list with comments, support for, or reasons not to adopt this work as
a WG document.
We wi
Hi all,
I support the adoption as WG document of this draft.
I think it is as good starting point in the view of automation of scheduling of
OAM tests.
One comment: the description of the second module "ietf-oam-test-sequence" is
reporting the same text of the ietf-oam-unitary-test .
Thanks
Ser
It appears that Joe Clarke (jclarke) said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>As the IPR poll has concluded (no IPR has been reported), the authors and
>chairs would like to call for adoption of
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gasser-opsawg-prefix-lengths/ . Please
>reply on-list with comments, support fo
