Re-,
Thanks for clarifying.
Added new text to cover these two points:
https://github.com/boucadair/attachment-circuit-model/commit/f11efbc5400ce5c4106ce4b57056fde4c8765bc1
The full changes can be tracked using the link shared in my first reply:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?url_1=ht
Hi Éric,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
> Envoyé : lundi 13 janvier 2025 17:43
> À : The IESG
> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common...@ietf.org; opsawg-
> cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; rro...@ciena
Bonjour Med,
And thanks for your prompt reply and proposed changes.
I have removed the comments that are agreed upon and left the ones with more
information by me (look for EV>)
Regards
-éric
From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
Date: Tuesday, 14 January 2025 at 10:41
To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-19: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Ple
I am not aware of an IPR related to this draft.
Russ
> On Jan 13, 2025, at 2:43 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 11:19:12 -0800
> From: Randy Bush
> To: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)"
> Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" ,
> draft-gasser-opsawg-prefix-leng...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG]IPR P
