Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-17.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working
Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF.
Title: Operational Considerations for Use of DNS in IoT Devices
Authors: Michael Richardson
Wei Pa
Mahesh,
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-16&url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-17&difftype=--html
contains changes to:
* remove "geofenced" from the appendix
* synchronizes expectation in Introduction for cooperation text in th
Hi Michael,
Thanks for taking care of the comments from Erik and John. I see that you
responded to Orie and Eric’s comments, and since they have not come back, I am
going to assume they are ok with the changes you have made.
I have asked Joe/Benoit to help me with the document. In the meantime,
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more inf
On Aug 15, 2024, at 12:34 PM, Joel Halpern via Datatracker
wrote:
> Minor issues:
>(Unclear if this is Major or Minor): The table layout for the IANA registry
>fails to conform to I-D / RFC requirements. Considered as text, it is much
>too wide. Considered as HTML, the normal rende
> We’re up to WG LC on this draft. We want to reconfirm any known IPR related
> to this work:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13/
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
> Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to
Reviewer: Tero Kivinen
Review result: Has Issues
This is YANG model providing configuration and information about Attachment
Circuits.
The section 5.2.5.5 describes the security parts, but it is mostly
content free, I mean I have no idea what it would mean if you say
encryption is enabled on L2,
Hi Paul,
Please let me know if this change addresses your DISCUSS on the document.
Thanks.
> On Jul 22, 2024, at 3:32 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hi Mahesh, all,
>
> Thanks for sharing this update.
>
> ==
> The solution we came up with is for IANA to list the three drafts, R
